PubMed · 10738023
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J B Gorlin, R Cable. 2000. What is a unit?. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40030263.x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Universal leukodepletion of blood components to prevent acute non-hemolytic transfusion reactions (NHTRs) is still a subject of debate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Transfusion-associated NHTRs observed at our hospital in the last 6 years were retrospectively analyzed. Buffy-coat depleted red blood cells (bc-RBCs), and if indicated, leucodepleted post-storage (ld-RBCs) were initially used. In April 1997, universal leukodepletion was implemented at our hospital, and thereafter only prestorage ld-RBCs were used. All platelet concentrates transfused during this time were prestorage filtered single-donor apheresis platelets (SDAPs). RESULTS: A total of 163,090 blood products were transfused from April 1995 to April 2001 (bc-RBC: n=34,040 units; ld-RBC: n=66,967; SDAP: n=14,516; FFP: n=47,567). The number of post-transfusion febrile NHTRs occurring with each blood product was 65 (0.19%) for bc-RBCs, 8 (0.16%) for post-storage ld-RBCs, 16 (0.03%) for prestorage ld-RBCs, 16 (0.11%) for SDAPs, and 10 (0.02%) for FFP. Allergic reactions (n=116) were most frequently observed after SDAP transfusion (0.32%) and occurred at a similarly low rate after transfusion of all other blood components (0.03-0.08%). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, acute NHTRs rarely occur after the use of leukodepleted blood components. Prestorage appears to be more effective than post-storage leukodepletion in preventing febrile reactions following a blood transfusion.
BACKGROUND: This is the first survey of therapeutic hemapheresis in Norway. The purpose was to collect data from all Norwegian dialysis and blood units performing hemapheresis treatment and stem cell collection for comparison with Swedish data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to all regional and central hospitals in Norway including two specialized centres for stem cell apheresis. The questions included the number of hemapheresis procedures, patients, and indications. RESULTS: All units responded to the questionnaire. There were 17 dialysis units; seven blood units and two special units who performed 2,141 procedures. 12 units did not carry out any hemapheresis treatment at all. There were five stem cell collections per 100,000 inhabitants and 42.5 therapeutic apheresis procedures per 100,000 inhabitants. INTERPRETATION: Hemapheresis treatment is performed in all Norwegian health regions. The indications are quite similar to those reported from Sweden except for stem cell collections and erythrocytaphereses. The dominance of the dialysis units in the total number of procedures performed and the prominent use of filtration techniques are special features of the Norwegian practice of apheresis.
CONTEXT: Use of experimental therapies during but outside of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether initiation of an RCT leads to increased use of the experimental therapy outside the trial. DESIGN AND SETTING: Data on national apheresis use during 3 Canadian RCTs for multiple sclerosis (1986-1988), thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (1982-1988), and myeloma cast nephropathy (1998-2000) were obtained from 19 major medical centers in Canada. The multiple sclerosis and myeloma cast nephropathy trials had data on apheresis use for 3 years prior to and during the trials, which permitted a time-series analysis to determine the impact of the RCTs on the use of apheresis. The ongoing myeloma cast nephropathy trial provided data on the number of patients inside and outside of the RCTs in trial and nontrial centers. Initial and follow-up questionnaires were sent to 24 Canadian physicians in trial and nontrial centers to determine if they had noted an increase in apheresis activity during the trials and, if so, their explanation for it. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in number of patients undergoing apheresis for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, multiple sclerosis, and myeloma cast nephropathy prior to and during the respective RCTs compared with all patients undergoing apheresis during the same periods. RESULTS: During all 3 RCTs, there were large increases in use of apheresis. The majority of the increased use of apheresis was outside of the trials: for multiple sclerosis, 30 of 49 patients per year (61% of increase); thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, 49 of 56 patients per year (72% of increase); and myeloma cast nephropathy, 60 of 72 patients per year (57% of increase). The myeloma cast nephropathy study noted that this increase occurred in both nontrial and trial centers. Among questionnaire respondents (n = 22; 92% response rate), most physicians noted an increase in apheresis activity during the trials and attributed it to a "jumping-the-gun" phenomenon. CONCLUSIONS: During 3 Canadian RCTs, apheresis increased, but most of the increase occurred outside the trials. This behavior during an RCT, in the absence of clear efficacy, can be termed jumping the gun.