PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10773382

Differentiation between true microembolic signals and artefacts using an arbitrary sample volume.

D Georgiadis·F Uhlmann·A Lindner·S Zierz
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We evaluated a new discrimination technique between microemboli (MES) and artefact signals. Monitoring was performed over the middle cerebral artery (55 mm) and the brain parenchyma (29 mm). Intensity changes were expressed as percent of change compared to the value measured in the proximal depth. The cut-off value providing the highest sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation was evaluated using 250 MES and 250 artefact signals, and subsequently analysed in the first part of the study. Intensity values derived from the distal depth were subsequently evaluated in 10 patients undergoing cardiac surgery and 45 patients with potential arterial or cardioembolic source. Intensity changes of 87% (84%-90%) and -58% (-71%-(-48%)) were measured in the initial 500 signals for MES and artefact signals, respectively. The best intensity cut-off value was calculated at 27%. This value was subsequently applied to a total of 1858 MES and 1958 artefacts, resulting to sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 98%, respectively. The proposed technique provided adequate results, warranting further evaluation.

Explore related subjects

ArtifactsCardiac Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansIntracranial EmbolismMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Georgiadis, F Uhlmann, A Lindner, S Zierz. 2000. Differentiation between true microembolic signals and artefacts using an arbitrary sample volume.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-5629(99)00158-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗
PubMed2008

Impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants.

Cosmetic breast implants are increasing in popularity. The presence of a breast implant overlying the anterior mediastinal space as a cause of impairment of the echocardiographic acoustic window has not been described previously. Here, we report three cases with significant impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants. Clinicians should be aware of this interference and women should be informed of this dilemma before considering this cosmetic surgery.

Artifacts↗