PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10783794

A two-sample comparison for multiple ordered event data.

Abstract

A longitudinal study is conducted to compare the process of particular disease between two groups. The process of the disease is monitored according to which of several ordered events occur. In the paper, the sojourn time between two successive events is considered as the outcome of interest. The group effects on the sojourn times of the multiple events are parameterized by scale changes in a semiparametric accelerated failure time model where the dependence structure among the multivariate sojourn times is unspecified. Suppose that the sojourn times are subject to dependent censoring and the censoring times are observed for all subjects. A log-rank-type estimating approach by rescaling the sojourn times and the dependent censoring times into the same distribution is constructed to estimate the group effects and the corresponding estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal. Without the dependent censoring, the independent censoring times in general are not available for the uncensored data. In order to complete the censoring information, pseudo-censoring times are generated from the corresponding nonparametrically estimated survival function in each group, and we can still obtained unbiased estimating functions for the group effects. A real application and a simulation study are conducted to illustrate the proposed methods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S H Chang. 2000. A two-sample comparison for multiple ordered event data.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00183.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A seminar series in applied biostatistics for clinical research fellows, faculty and staff.

Familiarity with experimental design and statistical analysis techniques is necessary for investigators to conduct state-of-the-art research in clinical medicine. A wide range of options for biostatistical training is available. These include formal academic courses for credit, one-on-one education offered under the guise of consultation, self-paced textbook or computer learning, intensive short courses, portions of extended courses spanning an assortment of other subjects, and a continuing series of seminars or lectures covering selected topics in statistics. The latter structure is described in this article. We offered an eight-week lecture series focusing on a new topic in biostatistics each week. The course targeted clinical faculty, postdoctoral fellows, residents, and other interested research staff at a large medical research institution. The series focused on interpretation of medical journal articles with regard to statistical issues. Another objective was to provide information to increase a participant's expertise in the design of research studies. Guidance was offered for effective communication with collaborating biostatisticians. The format and contents of the seminar series are described. Aspects of the course that proved to be successful are discussed.

Biometry↗

Body of evidence.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Biometry↗