PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10784019

A bench-top method for evaluating modular total hip component combinations.

Abstract

A modular total hip prosthesis allows the surgeon to vary head size, neck length, and acetabular coverage. Different combinations, however, may increase the risk of impingement of the prosthesis neck on the acetabular liner, leading to dislocation. We developed a bench-top model to test different modular component combinations to determine how far the femoral component could travel within the acetabular liner before impingement led to dislocation. We tested two hip systems, each from a different manufacturer. Certain components increased the risk of impingement and dislocation: skirted necks, smaller heads, and lipped liners. While the contribution of each component was small, the risk was additive, so that the combination of a small head with a skirted neck in a lipped liner actually reduced the available range of motion by 18 degrees, from 146 degrees to 128 degrees, in the first system, and by 13 degrees, from 156 degrees to 143 degrees in the other. This method could be adapted to test a wide range of component configurations, from a number of manufacturers. These findings may be useful in avoiding potentially unstable configurations when given a choice of modular components.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R L Uhl, S C Williamson, R Williams, W Andrews, J Hutchison. 2000. A bench-top method for evaluating modular total hip component combinations.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10784019/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Influence of anteroposterior and mediolateral instability on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: an ultrasonographic study.

Ultrasonographically, the femoral component and the tibial plate of total knee prostheses are strongly echogenic, while the high-density polyethylene insert is hypoechoic. This study evaluated the influence of mediolateral and anteroposterior stability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on range of motion using real-time monitoring with ultrasound. Mediolateral stress translation, which is increased by horizontal resection of more bone at the ends of the femur or tibia for easy prosthesis implantation, was examined on coronal scans at the level of the collateral ligaments. Anteroposterior drawer was examined on sagittal scans at the level of the patellar tendon. Mediolateral translation (0-10 mm; mean 2.24 mm) did not correlate with range of motion, while anteroposterior drawer (2-10 mm, mean 5.05 mm) correlated well with range of motion. These ultrasonographic findings suggest that horizontal over-resection of the ends of the femur and tibia contributed to joint laxity, which would not result in better ROM. Rollback and sliding of the femoral component on the tibia, which is believed to be correlated with anteroposterior drawer, may be important in achieving better range of motion and obtaining excellent results in TKA.

Hip Prosthesis↗

Comparison of two modes of administration of a personalized quality of life scale in a longitudinal study of total hip arthroplasty.

UNLABELLED: Quality of life scales are being increasingly used to evaluate patients. The earliest scales were standardized questionnaire that did not necessarily provide an optimal evaluation of the quality of life of each individual patient. A number of personalized scales are now available, including the SEIQoL, in which the patients nominate the five quality of life areas most important to them. The SEIQoL has been validated. We tested the SEIQoL in patients treated by total hip arthroplasty, a procedure that is expected to improve quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To compare two methods of administration of the SEIQoL several months after total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The SEIQoL was administered before and after the arthroplasty. During the postoperative test session, the SEIQoL was administered twice, once using the items nominated preoperatively and once after allowing the patient to repeat the nomination procedure. RESULTS: With both methods, significant improvements in quality of life were demonstrated (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two methods. CONCLUSION: Changing the items of the SEIQoL during prospective studies does not modify the overall quality of life score. Keeping the same items throughout the study is nevertheless warranted.

Hip Prosthesis↗