PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10793895

Attention mechanisms for multi-location first- and second-order motion perception.

Abstract

We applied the external noise plus attention paradigm to study attention mechanisms involved in concurrent first-order and second-order motion perception at two spatial locations. Cued to attend to one of the locations, the observer was instructed to independently judge direction of motion of either first-order (Experiment 1) or second-order (Experiment 2) motion stimuli at both locations in every trial. Across trials, systematically controlled amounts of external noise were added to the motion displays. We measured motion threshold at three performance criteria in every attention x external noise condition. We find that observers could, without any loss, simultaneously compute first-order motion direction at two widely separated spatial locations across a broad range of external noise conditions. However, considerable loss occurred at the unattended location in processing second-order motion direction at two separated spatial locations. We conclude that, under the conditions investigated in the current study, (1) in first-order motion perception, the visual system could simultaneously process motion direction at two widely separated locations without any capacity limitation; (2) in second-order motion perception, attending to a spatial location enhances stimulus contrast at that location by a factor of about 1.37 (or equivalently, reduces the internal additive noise by a factor of about 0.73).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Z L Lu, C Q Liu, B A Dosher. 2000. Attention mechanisms for multi-location first- and second-order motion perception.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00172-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗