PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10794093

Experience with PCR screening.

Abstract

The COBAS AmpliScreen Hepatitis C (HCV) Test, Version 2.0, which is designed for screening pools composed of samples from individual units of blood or plasma, employs a MultiPrep sample processing procedure that simultaneously extracts and concentrates HCV, HIV-1 and Hepatitis B virus particles from plasma. An HCV Internal Control (IC) RNA serves as an extraction and amplification control for each independently processed sample. Processed samples are amplified by RT-PCR using HCV-specific complementary primers and detected by hybridization of the amplified products to HCV- and IC-specific oligonucleotide probes. The analytical sensitivity of the test is 25 International Units (IU) of HCV per mL of pooled plasma; all HCV genotypes are detected with similar efficiency. The test detected HCV RNA 23 to 32 days prior to anti-HCV antibody seroconversion for four of the five seroconversion panels tested. The test had sufficient sensitivity to reproducibly detect a single infected unit containing 2.4 x 10(3) copies of HCV per mL in a pool with 23 uninfected units. COBAS AmpliScreen tests for HIV-1 and HBV now being validated by Roche Molecular Systems also incorporate the MultiPrep specimen processing method, thereby making it possible to use a single processed specimen to screen for all three viruses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Sun, H Jayakar, S Yeh, M Mendoza, M H Wisbeski, W Iszczyszyn, E A Dragon. 2000. Experience with PCR screening.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10794093/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of methods for analysis of selective genotyping survival data.

Survival traits and selective genotyping datasets are typically not normally distributed, thus common models used to identify QTL may not be statistically appropriate for their analysis. The objective of the present study was to compare models for identification of QTL associated with survival traits, in particular when combined with selective genotyping. Data were simulated to model the survival distribution of a population of chickens challenged with Marek disease virus. Cox proportional hazards (CPH), linear regression (LR), and Weibull models were compared for their appropriateness to analyze the data, ability to identify associations of marker alleles with survival, and estimation of effects when all individuals were genotyped (full genotyping) and when selective genotyping was used. Little difference in power was found between the CPH and the LR model for low censoring cases for both full and selective genotyping. The simulated data were not transformed to follow a Weibull distribution and, as a result, the Weibull model generally resulted in less power than the other two models and overestimated effects. Effect estimates from LR and CPH were unbiased when all individuals were genotyped, but overestimated when selective genotyping was used. Thus, LR is preferred for analyzing survival data when the amount of censoring is low because of ease of implementation and interpretation. Including phenotypic data of non-genotyped individuals in selective genotyping analysis increased power, but resulted in LR having an inflated false positive rate, and therefore the CPH model is preferred for this scenario, although transformation of the data may also make the Weibull model appropriate for this case. The results from the research presented herein are directly applicable to interval mapping analyses.

Genotype↗