PubMed · 10846666
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P Peris. 2000-04-15. [Bone densitometry, 2000].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-7753(00)71356-x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Nitric oxide (NO) has been implicated in the local regulation of bone metabolism. However, the contribution made by specific NO synthase (NOS) enzymes is unclear. Here we show that endothelial NOS gene knockout mice (eNOS-/-) have marked abnormalities in bone formation. Histomorphometric analysis of eNOS-/- femurs showed bone volume and bone formation rate was reduced by up to 45% (P: < 0.01) and 52% (P: < 0.01), respectively. These abnormalities were prevalent in young (6 to 9 weeks old) adults but by 12 to 18 weeks bone phenotype was restored toward wild-type. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis confirmed the age-related bone abnormalities revealing significant reductions in femoral (P: < 0.05) and spinal bone mineral densities (P: < 0.01) at 8 weeks that were normalized at 12 weeks. Reduction in bone formation and volume was not related to increased osteoclast numbers or activity but rather to dysfunctional osteoblasts. Osteoblast numbers and mineralizing activity were reduced in eNOS-/- mice. In vitro, osteoblasts from calvarial explants showed retarded proliferation and differentiation (alkaline phosphatase activity and mineral deposition) that could be restored by exogenous administration of a NO donor. These cells were also unresponsive to 17ss-estradiol and had an attenuated chemotactic response to transforming growth factor-beta. In conclusion, eNOS is involved in the postnatal regulation of bone mass and lack of eNOS gene results in reduced bone formation and volume and this is related to impaired osteoblast function.
BACKGROUND: Different sources of dietary protein may have different effects on bone metabolism. Animal foods provide predominantly acid precursors, whereas protein in vegetable foods is accompanied by base precursors not found in animal foods. Imbalance between dietary acid and base precursors leads to a chronic net dietary acid load that may have adverse consequences on bone. OBJECTIVE: We wanted to test the hypothesis that a high dietary ratio of animal to vegetable foods, quantified by protein content, increases bone loss and the risk of fracture. DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study with a mean (+/-SD) of 7.0+/-1.5 y of follow-up of 1035 community-dwelling white women aged >65 y. Protein intake was measured by using a food-frequency questionnaire and bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Bone mineral density was not significantly associated with the ratio of animal to vegetable protein intake. Women with a high ratio had a higher rate of bone loss at the femoral neck than did those with a low ratio (P = 0.02) and a greater risk of hip fracture (relative risk = 3.7, P = 0.04). These associations were unaffected by adjustment for age, weight, estrogen use, tobacco use, exercise, total calcium intake, and total protein intake. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly women with a high dietary ratio of animal to vegetable protein intake have more rapid femoral neck bone loss and a greater risk of hip fracture than do those with a low ratio. This suggests that an increase in vegetable protein intake and a decrease in animal protein intake may decrease bone loss and the risk of hip fracture. This possibility should be confirmed in other prospective studies and tested in a randomized trial.
OBJECTIVE: The association of inflammatory arthritis with loss of periarticular bone mineral density (BMD) has been well established. However, changes in bone density cannot be quantified by conventional radiography. This study aimed at developing a new technique for measurement of periarticular bone density at the knee joint by dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) and assessing the precision of this technique for selected areas around the knee. METHODS: To validate this technique for bone density assessment in both patient and control subjects, knee joints from healthy subjects and patients with inflammatory arthritis were selected for study. Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral scans of both knees were acquired with the Hologic 4500 elite bone densitometer. Each scan was repeated three times, with repositioning between scans. Knee scans were obtained with the forearm software and evaluated by subregion analysis. Seven femoral and seven tibial subregions of interest (ROIs) were selected on PA scans. Six ROIs were selected on lateral scans. Precision was determined for each ROI selected. RESULTS: 14 knee joints were studied in each group. Precision, expressed as percentage coefficient of variation (CV%), varied widely between subregions. PA scans were most appropriate for measurement of femoral bone density (CV% = 1.89-2.64%), whereas the best value obtained for ROIs within the tibia was on the lateral scan, where CV% for measurement of the proximal 5 mm was 2.67% in the patient group. CV% for BMD of the patella was excellent at 0.84% in the patient group. CONCLUSION: This new application of DXA can be used to measure periarticular bone density at the knee joint. Regions within the distal femur and patella have been identified as the optimal areas to study