PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10871984

Data without a prayer.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R P Sloan, E Bagiella. 2000-06-26. Data without a prayer.. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.12.1870

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1 and GSTT1 and susceptibility to prostate cancer in the Japanese population.

Associations between genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 and prostate cancer (PCa) were analyzed in a case-control study of 315 individuals. The frequency of valine (Val)/valine (Val) genotypes for CYP1A1 was 11.3% in cases compared with 5.5% in controls, this polymorphism thus being associated with a significantly increased risk of PCa (odds ratio=2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.01-5.57). No links were detected between PCa and polymorphisms in other enzymes. However, the combination of CYP1A1 (Ile/Val and/or Val/Val) polymorphisms with the GSTM1 null type resulted in an OR of 2.2 (CI=1.10-4.57, 1.12-4.20, respectively). This study suggests that the CYP1A1 polymorphism and its combination with GSTM1 may be associated with PCa susceptibility in the Japanese population.

Case-Control Studies↗

Methodological principles of case-control studies that analyzed risk factors for antibiotic resistance: a systematic review.

Case-control studies that analyze the risk factors for antibiotic-resistant organisms have varied epidemiological methodologies, which may lead to biased estimates of antibiotic risk factors. A systematic review of case-control studies that analyzed risk factors for antibiotic-resistant organisms addressed 3 methodological principles: method of control group selection, adjustment for time at risk, and adjustment for comorbid illness. A total of 406 abstracts were reviewed. Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were reviewed and evaluated for the 3 methodological principles. Thirteen (35%) of 37 studies chose the preferred control group. Eleven adjusted for time at risk. Twenty-seven adjusted for comorbid illness. Future studies need to consider more closely the optimization of control group selection, adjusting for confounding caused by time at risk, and adjusting for confounding caused by comorbid illness.

Case-Control Studies↗