PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10872115

[Disorders of auditory processing and perception. Consensus statement].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Ptok, R Berger, C von Deuster, M Gross, A Lamprecht-Dinnesen, A Nickisch, H J Radü, V Uttenweiler. 2000. [Disorders of auditory processing and perception. Consensus statement].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001060050580

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Modeling temporal and compressive properties of the normal and impaired auditory system.

Three modifications of a psychoacoustically and physiologically motivated processing model [Dau et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102 (1997a) 2892-2905] are presented and tested. The modifications aim at simulating sensorineural hearing loss and incorporate a level-dependent peripheral compression whose properties are affected by hearing impairment. Model 1 realizes this difference by introducing for impaired listeners an instantaneous level-dependent expansion prior to the adaptation stage of the model. Model 2 and Model 3 realize a level-dependent compression with time constants of 5 and 15 ms, respectively, for normal hearing and a reduced compression for impaired hearing. In Model 2, the compression occurs after the envelope extraction stage, while in Model 3, envelope extraction follows compression. All models account to a similar extent for the recruitment phenomenon measured with narrow-band stimuli and for forward-masking data of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects using a 20-ms, 2-kHz tone signal and a 1-kHz-wide bandpass noise masker centered at 2 kHz. A clear difference between the different models occurs for the processing of temporally fluctuating stimuli. A modulation-rate-independent increase in modulation-response level for simulating impaired hearing is only predicted by Model 1 while the other two models realize a modulation-rate-dependent increase. Hence, the predictions of Model 2 and Model 3 are in conflict with the results of modulation-matching experiments reported in the literature. It is concluded that key properties of sensorineural hearing loss (altered loudness perception, reduced dynamic range, normal temporal properties but prolonged forward-masking effects) can effectively be modeled by incorporating a fast-acting expansion within the current processing model prior to the nonlinear adaptation stage. Based on these findings, a model of both normal and impaired hearing is proposed which incorporates a fast-acting compressive nonlinearity, representing the cochlear nonlinearity (which is reduced in impaired listeners), followed by an instantaneous expansion and the nonlinear adaptation stage which represent aspects of the retro-cochlear information processing in the auditory system.

Auditory Pathways↗

Functional anatomy of auditory brainstem nuclei: application to the anatomical basis of brainstem auditory evoked potentials.

Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) are used routinely in clinical practice to evaluate the normality of the lower auditory system. The objective of this review is to describe the functional anatomy of the structures implicated in BAEP generation (cochlear nerve and the auditory brainstem nuclei). Indications and results of BAEP in clinical practice are presented and correlated with auditory structures, which generate each waveform of BAEP.

Auditory Pathways↗