PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10880929

[What strategy after three trabeculectomy failures?].

Abstract

Three trabeculectomy failures raises the delicate problem of refractory glaucoma with unresponsive ocular hypertony. The therapeutic strategy requires first a careful assessment of the reasons for the previous failures (internal or external obstacles to filtration which might have responded to preventive treatment), then, depending on the patient's age, type of glaucoma, anatomic status of the ocular structures and the visual potential of the eye, a choice has to be made between different surgical techniques aimed at favoring aqueous humor evacuation (trabeculectomy associated with antimetabolites or drainage implant) or destruction of the ciliary body to reduce intraocular pressure by limiting the production of aqueous humor. Choosing between these two possibilities is not an easy task as success rates are highly variable on such eyes and complications are frequent, leading to lower visual acuity in 30 % of the cases. These salvage procedures recall that first line trabeculectomy must be optimized in all cases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Hamard. 2000. [What strategy after three trabeculectomy failures?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10880929/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy?

AIM: To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures. METHODS: Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flaps (4 x 4 mm, 16 mm(2), n=12) or small scleral flaps (3 x 2 mm, 6 mm(2), n=9) were constructed over 0.76 mm(2) sclerostomies. For each procedure, equilibrium IOP was measured following tight closure with two four-throw adjustable 10-0 nylon sutures. RESULTS: Five scleral flaps were thin or poorly constructed; four of these were in the initial seven procedures, implying learning effect. These had a mean absolute IOP of 7.6 mmHg (range 2.7-12.4 mmHg) and mean relative IOP of 28.3% of baseline (range 10-45.8%) after closure. In the remaining 16 good quality procedures, mean IOP was 1.3 mmHg (range 0-3.4 mmHg) after sclerostomy, confirming minimal outflow resistance before closure. Following flap closure mean IOP was 20 mmHg (SD 4.4, range 15.5-29.3 mmHg) for large (n=8), and 18.7 mmHg (SD 3.6, 15.9-25.8 mmHg) for small (n=8) flaps (unpaired t-test, P=0.26). Mean IOP (% baseline) was 71.6% (SD 8.4, range 60.6-86.6%) and 66% (SD=12.7, 46.8-86.6%) for large and small flap groups, respectively (unpaired t-test, P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Well-constructed scleral flaps of both sizes were able to support an average IOP at least two-thirds of baseline, and both had similar absolute IOP levels. Errors in flap construction resulted in loss of IOP control. Smaller flap size does not appear to compromise control of early postoperative IOP using adjustable sutures.

Glaucoma↗