PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10986903

[Computer-assisted surgery].

F Gebhard·L Kinzl·M Arand
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The term "computer-assisted surgery" (CAS) contains a variety of different applications. Priorities in trauma surgery have navigation systems. In fact, two basically different developments can be distinguished: on one hand, the possibility of navigation, based on preoperative CT data sets; and on the other hand navigation in intraoperative C-arm images. With the present available navigation technology, it can be assumed that intraoperative CT-based tracking in the field of spinal surgery can be performed accurately, regardless of whether active or passive markers are used. Another navigation option is C-arm-based osteosynthesis of the proximal femur. An application of navigation assistance in the field of pelvic surgery is osteotomy and placement of iliosacral screws. Future developments will have to concentrate on the technical characteristics of each navigation system. Advantageous concepts of visualization may generate required information to the surgeon in a way that unconstrained interaction at the operation table is combined with simultaneous integration of virtual and computer-aided visual information. New tracking systems will allow the reconstruction of data sets after reposition of segmented bone fragments, so that also in complex pelvic fractures the implantation of screws after reposition will be possible. Computer-aided surgery is able to improve the precision of operations in trauma surgery. In future, further developments of navigation systems can be expected. This fact is supported by the establishment of faster and cheaper hardware, as well as more intelligent and user-friendly software.

Explore related subjects

Bone ScrewsCervical VertebraeComputer SystemsGeneral SurgeryHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeurosurgeryOrthopedicsOsteotomyPelvic BonesSoftwareSpinal FracturesSpineTherapy, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyWounds and InjuriesX-Ray Intensifying ScreensComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Gebhard, L Kinzl, M Arand. 2000. [Computer-assisted surgery].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130050593

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Experimental validation of noninvasive referencing in navigated procedures on long bones.

Navigation procedures in orthopedic surgery require fixation of reference markers to the anatomic region of interest. Inadequate fixation might lead to micromotion or loosening of the reference marker, consequently causing registration failures or errors in navigation. Osseous rigid fixation is usually achieved by minimally invasive Schanz screws or pins. The goal of this study was to evaluate a non invasive external fixation device, a headband so far used in cranial navigation, as an alternative invasive fixation technique to reference markers in the femur. A common navigation system with an adapted trauma software application was used to track the positions of the soft tissue-attached headband relative to an invasive reference marker on the femur during manipulations of the thigh. Relative translative and rotational movements of the headband were measured during defined movements of the hip and knee and manipulations of the headband itself. The results revealed high translative and rotational movements, up to 6 mm and 3 degrees , respectively, due to minor manipulations of the affected lower extremity. Noninvasive soft tissue fixation with a headband does not allow rigid fixation for accurate navigated registration or operative procedures at the femur. Necessary intraoperative movements or manipulations would cause substantial registration failures. Invasive fixation techniques with screws or pins are still the method of choice.

Bone Screws↗
PubMed2007

Safety of computer-assisted surgery for cannulated hip screws.

Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery has developed considerably during the past few years. Several manufacturers produce hardware and software for use in trauma surgery. Validation of these systems before clinical application is mandatory to be sure they work accurately and safely. The accuracy of surgical performance is highly correlated with the cut-out percentages of hip screws. In a standardized operative setting, three cannulated hip screws were inserted in each of 20 sawbones. The screws were positioned either by fluoroscopic navigation technique or by conventional operative technique depending on randomization. Our primary aim was to assess whether computer-navigated screw fixation is equally safe compared with conventional screw fixation using fluoroscopy. To determine safety, we investigated number of drilling attempts, screw position, and radiation time. Secondary to these safety parameters, we also compared the operating time between the two procedures to assess the efficiency of computer navigation. Statistical analysis showed no differences regarding accuracy of screw position. Computer-assisted surgery resulted in fewer drilling attempts and less radiation time, with a similar operation time. We believe the currently used navigation system is safe and accurate.

Bone Screws↗
PubMed2007

Techniques of posterior C1-C2 stabilization.

Instability of the atlantoaxial complex may result from inflammatory, traumatic, congenital, neoplastic, or degenerative disorders and often requires surgical stabilization. Initial dorsal wiring techniques allow safe fixation but require rigid external immobilization and have been associated with high fusion failure rates. Rigid screw fixation techniques including transarticular screw fixation and C1-C2 rod-cantilever fixation offer higher fusion rates and less need for rigid immobilization but are more technically demanding. C1-C2 fixation using crossing C2 laminar screws offers rigid fixation but without the technical demands of C2 pars placement. The history and techniques of dorsal fixation of the atlantoaxial complex are reviewed, and the success rates and complications of each are discussed.

Bone Screws↗