PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11055286

Injectable biodegradable polymer composites based on poly(propylene fumarate) crosslinked with poly(ethylene glycol)-dimethacrylate.

Abstract

New injectable, in situ crosslinkable biodegradable polymer composites were investigated consisting of poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF), poly(ethylene glycol)-dimethacrylate (PEG-DMA), and beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP). We examined the effects of the PEG-DMA/PPF double-bond ratio and beta-TCP content on the crosslinking characteristics of the composites including the maximum crosslinking temperature and the gel point, as well as the properties of the crosslinked composites such as the compressive strength and modulus, and the water-holding capacity. The maximum crosslinking temperature was constant averaging 39.7 degrees C for the composite formulations tested. The gel points varied from 8.0 +/- 1.0 to 12.6 +/- 2.5 min and were not affected by the relative amounts of PEG-DMA. The compressive strength at yield of PEG-DMA/PPF composites without beta-TCP increased from 5.9 +/- 1.0 to 11.2 +/- 2.2 MPa as the double-bond ratio of PEG-DMA/PPF increased from 0.38 to 1.88. An increase in compressive modulus was also observed from 30.2 +/- 3.5 to 58.4 +/- 6.2 MPa for the same range of the PEG-DMA/PPF double-bond ratio. Also, the addition of beta-TCP (33 wt%) enhanced the mechanical properties of all composites. The equilibrium water content of networks without beta-TCP increased from 21.7 +/- 0.2 to 30.6 +/- 0.2% for a double-bond ratio of PEG-DMA/PPF ranging from 0.38 to 1.88. However, the mechanical properties of the swollen composites under compression were smaller than the dry ones. These data demonstrate the feasibility of fabricating injectable biodegradable polymer composites with engineered mechanical properties for orthopedic tissue engineering.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S He, M J Yaszemski, A W Yasko, P S Engel, A G Mikos. 2000. Injectable biodegradable polymer composites based on poly(propylene fumarate) crosslinked with poly(ethylene glycol)-dimethacrylate.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00106-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Covalent immobilization of redox enzyme on electrospun nonwoven poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid) nanofiber mesh filled with carbon nanotubes: a comprehensive study.

In this work, novel conductive composite nanofiber mesh possessing reactive groups was electrospun from solutions containing poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid) (PANCAA) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) for redoxase immobilization, assuming that the incorporated MWCNTs could behave as electrons transferor during enzyme catalysis. The covalent immobilization of catalase from bovine liver on the neat PANCAA nanofiber mesh or the composite one was processed in the presence of EDC/NHS. Results indicated that both the amount and activity retention of bound catalase on the composite nanofiber mesh were higher than those on the neat PANCAA nanofiber mesh, and the activity increased up to 42%. Kinetic parameters, K(m) and V(max), for the catalases immobilized on the composite nanofiber mesh were lower and higher than those on the neat one, respectively. This enhanced activity might be ascribed to either promoted electron transfer through charge-transfer complexes and the pi system of carbon nanotubes or rendered biocompatibility by modified MWCNTs. Furthermore, the immobilized catalases revealed much more stability after MWCNTs were incorporated into the polymer nanofiber mesh. However, there was no significant difference in optimum pH value and temperature, thermal stability and operational stability between these two immobilized preparations, while the two ones appeared more advantageous than the free in these properties. The effect of MWCNTs incorporation on another redox enzyme, peroxidase, was also studied and it was found that the activity increased by 68% in comparison of composite one with neat preparation.

Acrylates↗

The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of various finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of six different composite resin materials (Artemis Enamel, TPH Spectrum, Filtek A-110, Filtek Supreme Enamel, Solitaire 2, and Filtek P-60) as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of the surface sealant application (BisCover) on the surface roughness after finishing and polishing procedures of tested composites. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Specimens (n=168) measuring 5 mm in diameter x 2 mm in thickness were fabricated in a plexiglass well covered with a Mylar strip using six composite resins. A control group of seven specimens of each material received no polishing after being cured under the Mylar strip. Twenty-one specimens for each composite were randomly divided among three finishing and polishing groups (n=7). Each group was polished using a different system: Carbide bur/Sof-Lex disc, Carbide bur/Enhance disc with polishing paste, and Carbide bur/Edenta composite finishing kit. The average surface roughness (Ra, microm) of the control and treated specimens were measured with the Mitutoyo Surftest-402 Surface Roughness tester. After a surface sealant (BisCover) was applied to all treated specimens, according to manufacturer's instructions, the average roughness (Ra) was measured again. Results were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post-hoc Scheffe's test at a p<0.05 significance level. RESULTS: Significant differences were found for the surface roughness (p<0.05) with interaction among composite resins and the finishing systems used (p<0.05). Enhance/Biscover finishing and polishing procedure surface was not significantly different from the Mylar strip surface groups (p>0.05). The Mylar strip group was not significantly different from the Sof-Lex/BisCover and Edenta/BisCover groups. The ranking of mean Ra values by materials was as follows: Filtek Supreme Enamel < Filtek A110 < TPH Spectrum < Artemis <Filtek P-60 < Solitaire 2. The ranking of mean Ra values by polishing systems was as follows: Enhance/BisCover < Mylar Strip < Sof-Lex/BisCover < Edenta/BisCover < Sof-Lex < Enhance < Edenta. CONCLUSION: Smoother surfaces were recorded for the Enhance/BisCover and the Mylar strip-formed surface groups. The composite finishing kit Edenta significantly increased the Ra for all tested composites (p<0.05). But after finishing with Edenta, the use of a surface sealant (BisCover) significantly improved the surface smoothness of all tested composites (p<0.05). Use of BisCover surface sealant on anterior and posterior resin composite restorations after finishing and polishing procedures is recommended.

Acrylates↗