PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11062941

Thin-section machine.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B R Gillings. 2000. Thin-section machine.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11062941/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Transient electrical birefringence study of the interaction between DNA and platinum compounds: cis-DDP, trans-DDP and TDP].

The interaction between DNA and the platinum compounds cis-DDP, trans-DDP and TDP has been studied in aqueous solution at pH 7.0 by transient electric birefringence (TEB). Data was obtained on the electro-optical characteristics and hydrodynamic properties of these solutions. The specific interactions between each of the three platinum compounds and DNA were differentiated, and their binding affinity for DNA phosphate sites was as follows, in decreasing order of importance: TDP >> cis-DDP > trans-DDP.

Birefringence↗

Pressure-temperature phase transition diagram for wheat starch.

Wheat starch suspensions in water (5% dry matter) were subjected to various pressures (0.1-600 MPa) and temperatures (-20 to 96 degrees C) for 15 min. The gelatinization rate was measured after treatment by using microscopic measurements of the loss of birefringence of the granules. This method was previously calibrated by differential scanning calorimetry. Curves of isogelatinization were found to be quite similar to a pressure-temperature (P-T) diagram of unfolding proteins. Results were first analyzed by considering the thermodynamic aspects related to the dT/dP curve shifts. On the basis of equations already shown for proteins, the P-T gelatinization diagram of wheat starch would show different kinds of thermal contributions, suggesting endothermic, athermic, or exothermic melting reactions. Second, as a practical consequence, these previous P-T areas corresponded to specific gelatinization conditions as confirmed by hydration evaluation measured by starch swelling index. Depending on the pressure-temperature conditions, gelatinization would involve hydration. Lowering the pressure and temperature resulted in a complete gelatinization with less hydration in comparison with a thermal treatment at atmospheric pressure. A hydration model based on an energetic approach was proposed.

Birefringence↗

Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part II.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Insufficient buccal bone volume can be a significant problem when loading dental implants in the maxilla. Increased potential for buccal fenestration and dehiscence can result in an exposed implant surface, mucosal irritation, decreased support, and potential implant failure. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to model the stress distribution around maxillary implants by comparing simulated occlusal loading of maxillary implants in a 2-dimensional photoelastic anatomic model and a dry skull model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two model systems were used. First, a 2-dimensional photoelastic anatomic frontal skull sectional model was prepared in the first molar region. Left and right maxillary metal cylinder implant analogues inclined at 0 and 25 degrees to the sagittal plane were loaded in simulated intercuspation. Second, a dry skull lined with a photoelastic coating on the buccal aspect over an embedded cylinder implant was prepared in the first molar region. Principal stress concentration was photographed on axial and nonaxial implant loading. RESULTS: On simulated intercuspal loading, maximum stress concentration occurred at the buccal concavity in both the 2-dimensional anatomic photoelastic and skull models. There was no stress concentration at the apices of the maxillary implants in the 2-dimensional model. On lateral loading of the skull model, stress was distributed along the entire buccal aspect of bone adjacent to the implant, with a higher concentration at the buccal concavity. CONCLUSION: Preservation of buccal supporting bone volume is desirable to obtain a physiological modeling response and to enhance the facial plate. Insufficient bone volume may result in buccal fenestration or dehiscence, which can precipitate mucosal irritation, decreased support, and potential implant failure.

Birefringence↗