PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11077344

Do adenoids regrow after excision?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to determine the incidence of symptomatic adenoidal regrowth after adenoidectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional follow-up study was done in a randomly selected group of 175 children who had undergone adenoidectomy 2 to 5 years earlier. Nasopharyngoscopy was performed in those children who still had symptoms of nasal obstruction. SETTING: All surgery was performed at an academic hospital-based practice in the northeastern United States by a single surgeon using a consistent operative technique. RESULTS: Forty-six (26%) patients had nasal airway obstruction symptoms at follow-up. Of the 35 who agreed to undergo nasopharyngoscopy, not a single one had adenoids occupying more than 40% of the nasopharynx, and most (71%) were found to have either no or only trace amounts of adenoidal tissue (usually in the pharyngeal recess). CONCLUSION: Adenoids rarely, if ever, regrow enough to cause symptoms of nasal obstruction after adenoidectomy that includes visualization and electrocautery of the adenoid bed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F J Buchinsky, M A Lowry, G Isaacson. 2000. Do adenoids regrow after excision?. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2000.110727

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Extramedullary plasmacytoma of the adenoids.

Extramedullary plasmacytomas are extremely rarely diagnosed in children. We report two cases of extramedullary plasmacytoma detected coincidentally in the adenoidectomy specimens of children younger than 4 years. We show that these children are disease-free after local excision as the only treatment. Surgical treatment without anti-neoplastic therapy in pediatric plasma cell dyscrasias of the pharyngeal lymphoid tissue may be a sufficient curative therapy.

Adenoidectomy↗

[Histology after adenoidectomy/tonsillectomy? No conformity in Germany concerning the histopathological examination of adenoids or tonsils in children up to the age of 10 years].

BACKGROUND: It is more and more doubted that adenoids or tonsils have to be examined histologically in pediatric cases, in which history and clinical signs and symptoms are conclusive for chronic inflammation or hyperplasia. It is unknown whether there is any conformity about this question in Germany. METHOD: The heads of all clinical departments of otorhinolaryngology (n=149) and a similar number of ENT specialists from the Berufsverband Deutscher HNO-Arzte (n=150) were surveyed by a simple questionnaire. They were asked if they would routinely send resected tissue for histopathological examination in the case of a child, up to 10 years old, presenting with a history and a status of chronic inflammation or hyperplasia and undergoing adenoidectomy or tonsillectomy. Furthermore they were asked whether they remembered any unusual or surprising report in this group of patients. RESULTS: Feedback was 79%. All tissue was sent for examination by 59% of the colleagues answering this evaluation; palatine tonsils only were sent for examination by 14%, and 27% of the physicians did not send any tissue for histological work-up. During their professional career 17% of the responding ENT specialists had received a surprising result from the histopathological examination. CONCLUSION: We do not have any consensus practiced in Germany concerning the necessity to send tissue for histopathological examination following adenoidectomy or tonsillectomy in children. It seems helpful to seek such consensus of opinion for medicolegal and socioeconomic reasons.

Adenoidectomy↗