PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11082864

Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)

Abstract

The approach to the irrelevant sound effect by Neath (2000) is discussed in terms of the contrast between content-based and process-based interference. Four themes are highlighted: First, problematic features of the feature model are highlighted; second, results not considered by Neath are presented; third, empirical underpinnings of the feature model not related to the irrelevant-sound effect are questioned; last, the parsimony of the feature model is questioned. The balance of the evidence seems to be in favor of a process-based approach, on the grounds that it provides a comprehensive account of acoustic and task-based factors within the irrelevant sound effect, for both speech and nonspeech sound.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Jones, S Tremblay. 2000. Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03214370

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Functional imaging during covert auditory attention in multiple sclerosis.

Recent literature suggests that the brain in multiple sclerosis (MS) undergoes reorganization that subserves the performance of visual and motor tasks. We identified sites of cerebral activity in 16 MS patients while performing a covert attention (CA) task, presented in the auditory modality. Positron emission tomography (PET) revealed activation of rostral/dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in normal subjects studied previously. Activity in this region was not significant in MS patients, but there was a large region of activity in superior temporal cortex. Decreased activation of frontal attentional networks and greater activity in sensory/perceptual cortical areas (auditory association cortex) suggests a reduction of transmission along white matter tracts connecting these regions. This study demonstrates cingulate hypoactivity and cerebral reorganization during auditory attention in MS.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Mismatch negativity in schizophrenia: a family study.

BACKGROUND: Mismatch negativity (MMN) is a measure of cortical activity that occurs in response to a change in auditory stimuli. We investigated whether MMN is a potential marker of genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia by comparing MMN in a group of patients with schizophrenia, their unaffected relatives, and controls. METHOD: There are 25 schizophrenic patients, 37 of their unaffected first-degree relatives, and 20 unrelated controls that performed the MMN task. Linear regression with robust standard errors, and accounting for correlations within families, was employed to test for differences in MMN amplitude between the groups. RESULTS: Patients had significantly smaller MMN amplitudes compared to both their unaffected relatives and controls at FZ (P<0.01) and at F3 (P=0.01), whereas relatives and controls did not differ at FZ or at F3. No differences were found between any of the groups at F4. Furthermore, we found no strong evidence that the MMN amplitude is a familial trait. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that the MMN amplitude is reduced in schizophrenia. However, the MMN does not show a significant familial influence and is normal among the unaffected relatives. We conclude that while the MMN is abnormal in patients with schizophrenia, it is a weak or unreliable marker of vulnerability when applied to subclinical populations, and therefore is unlikely to be an endophenotype for the disorder.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Enhanced re-habituation of the orienting response of the human event-related potential.

Previous studies found the amplitude of the orienting response (OR) of the human event-related potential to decrease with repeated stimulus presentations. This decrease has been suggested to reflect short-term habituation and/or long-term habituation, both of which are learning processes. However, this earlier research failed to provide direct evidence supporting this claim. The present study attempted to show that the OR pattern shares one important feature of habituation: an enhanced response decrement across stimulus-presentation blocks (enhanced re-habituation). Participants received four blocks of 25 auditory stimulus presentations and showed an OR decrement both within (short-term habituation) and across (long-term habituation) blocks. Importantly, the OR decreased more rapidly during later than initial trial blocks, suggesting enhanced re-habituation. The latter result supports the notion that the amplitude decrement reflects an elementary learning process.

Acoustic Stimulation↗