PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11086584

Text processing and feedback: what have we learned?

Abstract

In studies on the effects of feedback on text comprehension, it was determined that text content interacts differentially with the feedback provided. Specifically, the types of memorial representations sought must be considered in terms of type of text, feedback timing, frequency, and modality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Langer, V Keenan. 2000. Text processing and feedback: what have we learned?. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2000.87.2.406

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The effects of enhanced visual feedback on human synchronization.

The execution of actions not only reposes on the spatial and temporal organization of the movements as such but also on their appropriate imbedding into the environmental spatio-temporal constraints. Actually, performance outcome appears to be strongly influenced by the strength of the perception-action coupling. The present experiment wants to examine to what degree this coupling strength affects the spatial and spatio-temporal characteristics of a synchronization task. In particular, the effects of: (i) enhanced visual feedback; and (ii) a modification in the spatial organization of the task were investigated. To do so, a task was designed in which horizontal arm movements had to be synchronized with a target light moving horizontally or vertically at a sinusoidal speed. Subjects performed six experimental conditions representing three synchronization modes (horizontal in-phase, horizontal anti-phase and orthogonal) and two feedback conditions (no feedback and feedback). The results for movement amplitude and relative phase revealed the operation of task specific effects. Apparently, the availability of feedback at the perception-action coupling level provoked the use of different strategies to cope with the constraints of this synchronization task.

Feedback↗

The mechanism of self-recognition in humans.

Recognizing oneself as the owner of a body and the agent of actions requires specific mechanisms which have been elucidated only recently. One of these mechanisms is the monitoring of signals arising from bodily movements, i.e. the central signals which contribute to the generation of the movements and the sensory signals which arise from their execution. The congruence between these two sets of signals is a strong index for determining the experiences of ownership and agency, which are the main constituents of the experience of being an independent self. This mechanism, however, does not account from the frequent cases where an intention is generated but the corresponding action is not executed. In this paper, it is postulated that such covert actions are internally simulated by activating specific cortical networks or representations of the intended actions. This process of action simulation is also extended to the observation and the recognition of actions performed or intended by other agents. The problem of disentangling representations that pertain to self-intended actions from those that pertain to actions executed or intended by others, is a critical one for attributing actions to their respective agents. Failure to recognize one's own actions and misattribution of actions may result from pathological conditions which alter the readability of these representations.

Feedback↗