PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11089804

Radiation doses during CT fluoroscopy.

Abstract

CT fluoroscopy (CTF) is a relatively new imaging modality that is particularly useful for performing complex biopsy procedures. Despite the obvious benefits, the potential exists to deliver considerable radiation doses to both the patients and medical staff. The purpose of our study was to quantify the radiation levels based upon typical clinical procedures. To assess the potential radiation risks, the patient radiation doses via the CT dose index (CTDI) method were measured during CTF for a GE Pro-Speed CT scanner using standardized head and body phantoms and a CT ionization chamber. The measurements were performed for a variety of kVp, mA, and slice thickness settings. To determine patient radiation doses, the CT kVp, mA, and total CTF scan times were recorded for various biopsy procedures. To determine the radiation doses to the hands of the radiologists, a radiation survey meter was used to measure the scattered radiation from standard phantoms. The effectiveness of various types of leaded gloves and shields were also determined. The measured CTDI values ranged from 20.4 cGy min(-1) to 63.1 cGy min(-1) of CTF. For a group of 78 patients, the clinically utilized imaging times varied from 13.0 to 407 s with an mean time of 96.6 s +/- 78.9 s (1 standard deviation). The scattered x-ray radiation at the position of the radiologists hands performing the biopsy procedures was measured to be 0.6 to 1.5 mGy min(-1). The thin leaded gloves provided a relatively minimal reduction in the scattered radiation to the hands between 11% and 44% dependent upon the kVp and the type of glove. However, floor mounted radiation shields reduced the scattered radiation levels to the body by 94% to 99%. In comparison to standard x-ray fluoroscopy, CTF employs much higher radiation dose rates due to the higher kVp, mA, and rotating geometry. It is important to minimize the radiation dose to patients and staff by limiting the imaging times, employing lower mA settings, and using appropriate radiation protection measures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E L Nickoloff, A Khandji, A Dutta. 2000. Radiation doses during CT fluoroscopy.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-200012000-00013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Population and patient-specific target margins for 4D adaptive radiotherapy to account for intra- and inter-fraction variation in lung tumour position.

In this work, five 4D image-guidance strategies (two population, an offline adaptive and two online strategies) were evaluated that compensated for both inter- and intra-fraction variability such as changes to the baseline tumour position and respiratory pattern. None of the strategies required active motion compensation such as gating or tracking; all strategies simulated a free-breathing-based treatment technique. Online kilovoltage fluoroscopy was acquired for eight patients with lung tumours, and used to construct inter- and intra-fraction tumour position variability models. Planning was performed on a mid-ventilation image acquired from a respiration-correlated CT scan. The blurring effect of tumour position variability was included in the dose calculation by convolution. CTV to PTV margins were calculated for variability in the cranio-caudal direction. A population margin of 9.0 +/- 0.7 mm was required to account for setup error and respiration in the study population without the use of image-guidance. The greatest mean margin reduction was introduced by the offline adaptive strategy. A daily online correction strategy produced a small reduction (1.6 mm) in the mean margin from the offline strategy. Adaptively correcting for an inter-fraction change in the respiratory pattern had little effect on margin size due to most patients having only small daily changes in the respiratory pattern. A daily online correction strategy would be useful for patients who exhibit large variations in the daily mean tumour position, while an offline adaptive strategy is more applicable to patients with less variation.

Fluoroscopy↗

Patient and staff dosimetry in vertebroplasty.

STUDY DESIGN: Eleven vertebroplasty operations were studied in terms of radiation dose. OBJECTIVE: Doses to patients and staff associated with vertebroplasty were measured. Occupational doses were compared with the annual dose limits, and the effectiveness of the used radiation protection means was estimated. Patient dose was estimated by means of both surface and effective dose, and the radiation-induced risk was evaluated. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebroplasty is a recent minimally invasive technique for the restoration of vertebral body fractures. It involves fluoroscopic exposure, and so, it demands dose measurements for both patient and staff exposed to radiation. METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were placed on the medical personnel and the effective dose was derived. Slow films were placed to patients' skin to measure entrance surface dose. Furthermore, a Rando phantom loaded with TLDs was irradiated under conditions simulating vertebroplasty, in order to estimate effective dose to the patient. RESULTS: Mean fluoroscopy time was 27.7 minutes. Patient's mean skin dose was 688 mGy, while effective dose was calculated to be 34.45 mGy. It was estimated that the primary operator can perform about 150 vertebroplasty operations annually without exceeding the annual dose constraints, whereas occupational dose can be reduced by 76% using mobile shielding. CONCLUSIONS: Measures have to be taken to reduce patient's skin dose, which, in extreme cases, may be close to deterministic effects threshold. The highest dose rates, recorded during the procedure, were found for primary operator's hands and chest when no shielding was used.

Fluoroscopy↗

An inter-hospital comparison of patient dose based on clinical indications.

Patient dose is usually estimated for a single radiographic projection or computed tomography (CT) series. In this study, patient dose was calculated for predefined clinical indications (24 radiography, 11 CT). Members of the radiology staff of each of 11 hospitals were trained in dose measurement and calculation techniques. Based on clinical indications participants decided on imaging protocols and calculated cumulative effective dose for a complete examination. Effective dose ranged from <1 microSv to 0.6 mSv for examinations with radiographs and from 0.2 to 12 mSv for CT scans. Differences in the imaging protocols contributedd to a substantial variation in patient dose. For mammography, average glandular dose (AGD) was estimated for 32-, 53- and 90-mm compressed breast thicknesses, with a median value of 0.74, 1.74 and 3.40 mGy, respectively. The results presented here demonstrate that a pragmatic choice of dosimetry methods enables local staff to estimate effective dose. The inclusion of imaging protocols in the dose surveys provided a broader view on the variations in patient dose between hospitals.

Fluoroscopy↗