PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11164163

Editorial comment.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A J Kirsch. 2001. Editorial comment.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00849-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in Stickler syndrome.

The prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in Stickler syndrome has been reported to be much higher than in the general population. As a result, it has been recommended that all patients with Stickler syndrome undergo routine echocardiography and have antibiotic prophylaxis prior to surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in a large cohort of UK patients with Stickler syndrome in whom the clinical diagnosis has been confirmed by molecular genetic analysis. Probands and pedigrees were identified from the Vitreoretinal Service database according to previously published criteria. Ophthalmic, skeletal, audiometric, and orofacial features were assessed. Affected individuals underwent a full cardiological examination including auscultation and two-dimensional echocardiography. Mutation analysis of the COL2A1 and COL11A1 genes was carried out. Seventy-eight patients from 25 pedigrees were studied. Mutation analysis confirmed the clinical diagnosis in every pedigree. No patient was found to have clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease and no patient had significant mitral or other valvular prolapse on echocardiography. These data from a large cohort of UK patients with proven Stickler syndrome do not suggest an increased incidence of mitral valve prolapse over and above that found in the general population. Routine echocardiography screening and use of preoperative antibiotics are unnecessary and should be reserved for those individual cases where there is clear clinical indication.

Cohort Studies↗

ID2 expression in neuroblastoma does not correlate to MYCN levels and lacks prognostic value.

The MYCN proto-oncogene is frequently amplified in a subgroup of highly aggressive neuroblastomas. The molecular mechanism(s) by which the overexpressed MYCN contributes to an aggressive tumor cell behavior is not well understood. Recently, it was reported that the ID2 gene is a direct target for the MYCN and MYC transcription factors, and that ID2 expression and MYCN amplification correlate positively in neuroblastoma. In addition, ID2 expression was proposed as a negative prognostic parameter. As these results are of potential clinical importance, but not in agreement with our own initial observations, the putative correlation between ID2 and MYC(N) expression in neuroblastoma cell lines and tumors was reinvestigated. We found no correlation between MYCN and ID2 expression in neuroblastoma cell lines or tumor specimens. However, we did find a significant positive correlation between MYC and ID2 expressions in both MYCN-amplified and single-copy tumor specimens, and in MYCN single-copy cell lines. As previously reported, we also found an inverse correlation between MYC and MYCN expressions. Importantly, we could not confirm the reported prognostic power of ID2-expression in neuroblastoma. These data, obtained in two independent laboratories, challenge the previously proposed ID2-MYCN relation.

Cohort Studies↗