PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11184025

Apollo 11: an experiential model for team-based transformational change.

Abstract

Transformational change, or reengineering, is a tough assignment for any organization. The pay-off, however, can be huge: happier patients, reenergized staff, and increased productivity. This article describes the team-based Apollo 11 project at Southeast Health Center in Indianapolis. Although this redesign effort took 7 months of extraordinary team effort, it resulted in a 54% reduction in patient encounter time, a decrease of more than 40% in per-visit cost, and improved patient and staff satisfaction. This article summarizes the background and dynamics of Apollo 11, shares some initial project results, and summarizes the lessons learned, so that other healthcare organizations can successfully tackle the reengineering challenge.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P G Townes, D S Benson, P Johnston. Apollo 11: an experiential model for team-based transformational change.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.2000.tb00149.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The impact of micro health insurance on Rwandan health centre costs.

While the implications of payment mechanisms for provider behaviour and cost have been amply explored in industrialized countries, there is little empirical evidence from developing countries. This study exploits the opportunities created by a pilot study of micro health insurance with capitation in Rwanda to address this issue. Using cross-sectional data collected in 52 health centres, the paper employs an econometric cost function with payer-specific outputs to assess the cost impact of two provider payment mechanisms: (1) user fees for care paid by the uninsured, and (2) capitation payment paid by informal insurance schemes for the insured. The cost function allows payer-specific marginal and average costs and scale measures to be calculated. Findings point to significant differences in cost between the two payment forms. These may be due to the incentives embodied in the capitation provider payment or the less severe case-mix among insured patients arising from improved access to care for this group, or both. For both payment types there are important short-run economies of scale, which could be exploited through more intensive use of idle resources in health centres.

Community Health Centers↗