PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11206619

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Abstract

Although open nephrectomy is the standard of care for localized renal-cell carcinoma, the significant postoperative pain and lengthy convalescence have encouraged the use of laparoscopy, which can yield similar 2- to 5-year survival rates. Either a transperitoneal or a retroperitoneal approach may be used, and sometimes, they are combined. Generally, the technique is limited to tumors <10 cm, but larger tumors can be removed. Nitrous oxide is avoided as an anesthetic agent. The dissection follows accepted oncologic principles: in situ renal dissection within Gerota's fascia, early ligation of the renal vessels, and careful removal of the specimen to prevent tumor spillage. Dissection of the hilum is facilitated by a PEER retractor and an Endoholder. On average, patients having laparoscopic radical nephrectomy return to normal activities approximately 4.5 weeks sooner than those having open surgery, a fact not taken into account in cost analyses. Laparoscopic nephrectomy may offer a special benefit in patients with known metastatic disease, as interleukin-2 administration can be started a month earlier than after open surgery. There may also be immunologic benefits of minimally invasive v open surgery. The technique and instruments continue to evolve, and cost-effectiveness should continue to improve.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M D Dunn, E M McDougall, R V Clayman. 2000. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2000.14.849

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗