PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11245840

Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects.

J Driver·G Davis·C Russell·M Turatto·E Freeman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Issues concerning selective attention provoke new questions about visual segmentation, and vice-versa. We illustrate this by describing our recent work on grouping under conditions of inattention, on change blindness for background events and the residual processing of undetected background changes, on modal versus amodal completion in visual search, and the differential effects of these two forms of completion on attentional processes, and on attentional modulation of lateral interactions thought to arise in early visual cortex. Many of these results indicate that segmentation processes substantially constrain attentional processes, but the reverse influence is also apparent, suggesting an interactive architecture. We discuss how the 'proto-objects' revealed by studies of segmentation and attention (i.e. the segmented perceptual units which constrain selectivity) may relate to other object-based notions in cognitive science, and we wrestle with their relation to phenomenal visual awareness.

Explore related subjects

AttentionCognitive ScienceFunctional LateralityHumansPsychological TheoryVisual CortexVisual PerceptionJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Driver, G Davis, C Russell, M Turatto, E Freeman. 2001. Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00151-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Dynamics of hand preference in 4 year-old children.

Hand preference in groups of 4 year-old children towards either end of the skill continuum (as determined by the Movement ABC test) was explored by means of a catching task in which the 'direction of approach of the ball' was used as a control parameter within a dynamical systems framework. In Condition 1, the ball direction was systematically scaled in degrees from the right side of the subject to the left and vice versa. In Condition 2, the spatial location of the ball direction was varied randomly, rather than systematically, over the same range as for Condition 1. In both conditions, the two groups of children were shown to switch between hands (from left to right and vice versa) at well-defined positions on the scale. The different scale values obtained when ball direction was scaled from left to right compared with right to left were used to define hysteresis areas. These areas were more extensive and located more to the left of the midline for the group towards the less skilled end of the continuum than for those towards the more skilled end. Additionally, the less-skilled children were shown to use the right hand more to catch the balls delivered to the left side than did the more skilled children. In Condition 3, objects were placed on the table of the ball-delivery apparatus in order to make the catching action more complicated. The less skilled group were shown to use the right hand more than the left hand in all catching positions whereas the more skilled group showed an equal usage of both catching regimes.

Attention↗
PubMed2002

Deficits in language-mediated mental operations in patients with schizophrenia.

We found previously that a subgroup of schizophrenic patients who passed screening tests of attentional competence showed memory deficits on word memory tasks, but were comparable with controls on tone memory tasks. To better understand the nature of language-specific memory deficits in this subgroup of patients, the present experiment was designed to bypass early perceptual processing of verbal material and determine if patients continue to show impaired performance on verbal memory tasks. Patients who passed the screening tests ('discriminator' patients; DSz) received four serial position tasks. In two, familiar sounds or line drawings were presented and subjects were required to remember the word associated with each stimulus item. In the other two, subjects received hard-to-label auditory and visual stimuli (birdsongs or snowflakes).DSz patients showed large memory deficits compared with controls when required to remember words associated with the familiar sounds or drawings, providing clear evidence of deficits in verbal memory processes independent of sensory processing of verbal stimuli. The interaction between diagnosis and labeling was highly significant, confirming that these patients have particular difficulty with verbal as opposed to non-verbal memory. This was particularly striking on the auditory tests where two patients out-performed all controls on the birdsong test, but were below all controls on the easy-to-label sounds test. The verbal memory tests were easier than the non-verbal memory tests for controls, thus deconfounding task difficulty and deficit specificity.

Attention↗
PubMed2002

Attentional control in learning to discriminate bars and gratings.

Transfer effects of learning a spatial-frequency and a bar-width discrimination task on the performance in three other discrimination tasks (relative bar position, local width, and global-size discrimination) have been investigated. In the spatial-frequency discrimination learning task, subjects were trained with grating stimuli which varied in spatial frequency, relative bar position, and grating patch size, but only spatial frequency was relevant for discrimination. The bar-width discrimination learners had to judge the width of single grating bars appearing at random positions distributed around a display center. During the course of 10 consecutive days, all subjects showed a significant reduction of discrimination thresholds. Regarding learning transfer, we find that practicing the spatial-frequency discrimination task yields quite strong improvement of bar-width discrimination and, vice versa, learning bar-width discrimination also leads to strong improvement of spatial-frequency discrimination performance, indicating involvement of coding pathways which are shared by both tasks. On the other hand, there is no performance improvement when subjects do different tasks (grating patch size and relative bar position discrimination) with the same stimulus material as the learning stimuli. The finding of task-driven selective learning for only one local stimulus attribute among other local and global attributes shows that feature-based attentional preselection of basic stimulus attributes is involved in learning. Moreover, differential learning effects for two different local stimulus features indicate that, governed by top-down control, different neural pathways starting from the same low-level code base may be formed in the course of discrimination training.

Attention↗