PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11318173

Analyzing k (2 x 2) tables under cluster sampling.

Abstract

In many data analytic applications, such as ophthalmologic, longitudinal, or periodontal studies, multiple observations are recorded over several sites (or timepoints) within the same subject, bringing about dependence between measurements. This correlation, in turn, precludes the use of standard statistical methods that assume independence between outcome measurements. For example, the Mantel-Haenszel statistic, used to assess association between a binary outcome and a binary exposure while adjusting for a categorical covariate, does not follow the usual chi-squared distribution under the null hypothesis when there is correlation between observations. A modified Mantel-Haenszel procedure, which makes adjustment for dependence, is proposed. No particular correlation structure is assumed for responses within a cluster. This closed-form adjustment stems from Liang and Zeger's (1986, Biometrika 73, 13-22) generalized estimating equations approach for clustered data. The difference between this tabular (i.e., noniterative) technique and many earlier tabular methods is that the current method allows for consideration of site-specific exposure and covariate information. An example from a periodontal research study illustrates application of the method.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M D Begg. 1999. Analyzing k (2 x 2) tables under cluster sampling.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00302.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A functional analysis of the crown architecture of tropical forest Psychotria species: do species vary in light capture efficiency and consequently in carbon gain and growth?

The crown architectures of 11 Psychotria species native to Barro Colorado Island, Panama were reconstructed from field measurements of leaf and branch geometry with the three-dimensional simulation model Y-plant. The objective was to assess the role of species differences in architecture in light capture and carbon gain in their natural understory environment. When species were grouped according to their putative light environment preference, the shade tolerant species were found to have a small but significantly higher efficiency of light capture for both diffuse and direct light as compared to the light demanding species. Within each grouping, however, there were few significant differences in light capture efficiency among species. The lower efficiencies of light demanding species was due to slightly higher self-shading and slightly lower angular efficiencies. Simulations of whole plant assimilation showed that light demanding species had greater daily assimilation in both direct and diffuse light due to the significantly greater light availability in the sites where light demanding species were found, as compared to those where shade tolerant species occurred. Among light demanding species, the above ground relative growth rate measured over a 1-year period by applying allometric equations for mass versus linear dimensions, was positively correlated with diffuse PFD and with mean daily assimilation estimated from Y-plant. For the shade tolerant plants, there was no significant correlation between RGR and mean daily assimilation or with any measure of light availability, probably because they occurred over a much narrower range of light environments. Overall, the results reveal a strong convergence in light capture efficiencies among the Psychotria species at lower values than previously observed in understory plants using similar approaches. Constraints imposed by other crown functions such as hydraulics and biomechanical support may place upper limits on light capture efficiency.

Biometry↗

[Guidelines for writing biomedical articles containing statistical figures and analysis].

Some advices are provided in order to make statistical figures and analyses more correct in biomedical articles. The sample size has an outstanding significance. Analysing different statistical relationships the requirements of biometry should be fulfilled (number and distribution of data etc.) and interpretation of statistical findings could be done only within the domain of minimal and maximal values of independent variable. Extrapolation is not recommended due to the specific nature of the biomedical system. In some cases laboratory data should be transformed mathematically and the results of subsequent statistical calculations should be retransformed back into the biomedical system.

Biometry↗