PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11323559

Sideline preparedness for the team physician: consensus statement.

Abstract

The objective of the Sideline Preparedness Statement is to provide physicians who are responsible for making decisions regarding the medical care of athletes with guidelines for identifying and planning for medical care and services at the site of practice or competition. It is not intended as a standard of care and should not be interpreted as such. The Sideline Preparedness Statement is only a guide, and as such, is of a general nature, consistent with the reasonable, objective practice of the health care professional. Individual treatment will turn on the specific facts and circumstances presented to the physician at the event. Adequate insurance should be in place to help protect the physician, the athlete, and the sponsoring organization. The Sideline Preparedness Statement was developed by a collaboration of six major professional associations concerned about clinical sports medicine issues; they have committed to forming an ongoing project-based alliance to bring together sports medicine organizations to best serve active people and athletes. The organizations are: American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Sports Medicine, American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, and American Osteopathic Academy of Sports Medicine.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2001. Sideline preparedness for the team physician: consensus statement.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200105000-00027

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Injuries in Swedish skydiving.

OBJECTIVE: To create a basis for prevention of modern skydiving injuries. DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological study. SETTING: National total material. PATIENTS: Data on all reported injury events (n = 257) in Swedish skydiving 1999-2003 (total 539,885 jumps) were retrieved from the Swedish Parachute Association. Non-fatally injured skydivers were sent a questionnaire asking for event and injury details (response rate 89%), and supplementary hospital records were retrieved for the most serious injuries (n = 85). Human, equipment and environmental factors were assessed for risk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Frequency and severity of injuries. RESULTS: Incidence of non-fatal injury events was 48 per 100,000 jumps. The lower extremities, spine and shoulders were important regions of injury. The most serious injuries were experienced by licensed skydivers, but students in training had a higher injury rate and more often left the sport because of the injury. Of two student-training systems, one had an incidence less than half that of the other. CONCLUSIONS: A basis for prevention was created, showing a potential for reduction of frequency and severity of injuries with training and technical interventions.

Athletic Injuries↗

Screening for catastrophic neck injuries in sports.

The cervical spine is prone to injury due to the structure of the articulating vertebrae at the level of C4-C6, where the spinal cord occupies more of the spinal canal. Cervical spine injuries can occur in all sports and all ages. Participation in contact sports certainly increases the possibility of cervical spine injuries. In screening for catastrophic neck injuries it is vital to examine incidence and injury surveillance statistics in sports. These data can help determine sport-specific preponderance of catastrophic injury. Screening methods for predisposition to catastrophic cervical spine injuries include a concise history, physical examination, and radiographic methods. There is currently no universal classification system utilizing imaging of the cervical spine that has been validated as a screening method for catastrophic neck injuries.

Athletic Injuries↗