PubMed · 11340516
[Comparative study between different conjunctival tissue adhesives].
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and clinical and histopathological tolerance of a new acrylic tissue adhesive (ADAL-2) compared to sutures (Vicryl) and other available tissue adhesives (Tisuacryl) for their use in conjunctival surgery. METHODS: This was an experimental study performed in New Zealand albino rabbits with conjunctival dissection and closure by ADAL-2. Groups treated with Vicryl and Tisuacryl were compared regarding efficacy, clinical, and histological tolerance at 7, 28 and 42 days. RESULTS: Efficacy was similar in the three methods of conjunctival repositioning evaluated. Tolerance to ADAL-2 was similar to that of Vicryl suture and tolerance to ADAL-2 was superior to that to Tisuacryl. Histopathological results with ADAL-2 and Tisuacryl are similar. CONCLUSIONS: ADAL-2 tissue adhesive is an efficient and very well tolerated alternative for conjunctival closure in ophthalmic surgery.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J J Gómez González, M E Mulet Homs, J L Alió y Sanz, M M Mahiques Bujanda, Y Molina Alfonso, J M Martín Martínez. 2001. [Comparative study between different conjunctival tissue adhesives].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11340516/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.