PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11349217

Multiple chromosomal underrepresentations detected by interphase cytogenetics - possible prognostic markers in head and neck tumors?

Abstract

Relevant prognostic factors for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are tumor extension (pT), occurrence of lymph node metastases (pN) and grade of differentiation (G). We tried to correlate these histological characteristics with numerical aberrations of whole chromosomes as demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques (FISH). Therefore, we investigated isolated interphase cells from paraffin sections of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region from 46 patients with centromeric DNA probes for chromosomes 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18, X and Y. The majority of tumor samples showed aneuploidy for most chromosomes analyzed. The main chromosomal abnormality was loss of chromosomal material, predominantly of chromosomes 3 (28%), 6 (20%), 9 (26%), 10 (24%) and 18 (33%). Multiple deletions could be demonstrated more frequently in poorly differentiated carcinomas (88% G3-tumors with more than one deletion in contrast to 66% G2-tumors). The occurrence of multiple deletions may also correlate with progression in lymph node metastasis (66% in pN0-tumors vs. 85% in pN2-tumors), whereas the differences between the stages of primary tumor extension were not so obvious. Despite of a some-what disproportionate distribution of tumors in the different pT- and pN-stages and the rather low number of cases, our results suggest a relationship between the quantity of chromosomal underrepresentation, grade of differentiation and higher lymph node stage. Therefore, they underline the importance of chromosomal deletions as a possible additional prognostic marker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Kleist, A Bankau, G Lorenz, M Poetsch. 2001. Multiple chromosomal underrepresentations detected by interphase cytogenetics - possible prognostic markers in head and neck tumors?. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03032601

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Maternal age as a driver of genome instability: mechanisms linking aneuploidy, mutagenesis and mitochondrial dysfunction.

Advanced maternal age is a well-established risk factor for adverse reproductive outcomes due to increased rates of aneuploidy. However, emerging evidence indicates that the genetic consequences of maternal aging extend well beyond chromosome mis-segregation. Aging oocytes acquire a broad spectrum of genetic abnormalities, including maternally derived nuclear de novo mutations (DNMs) and mitochondrial DNA mutations, together with epigenetic dysregulation of DNA methylation and post-translational modification levels. These changes reflect the unique biology of the female germline in which oocytes remain arrested in meiotic prophase I for decades. Age-related deterioration of key processes, such as erosion of cohesion complexes, altered meiotic recombination, and weakened spindle assembly checkpoint surveillance collectively destabilize meiotic chromosome architecture, directly driving chromosome mis-segregation. At the same time, accumulation of endogenous DNA damage and declining DNA damage and repair processes increase the chances of transmitting lesions that can be converted into sequence-level mutations during the earliest embryonic divisions, when genome maintenance relies exclusively on maternal factors. High-resolution sequencing studies further demonstrate that maternal aging is associated with increased DNMs burden in both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Together, these findings support a model in which maternal aging is a driver of genome-wide instability that links aneuploidy and mutagenesis through shared defects in meiotic surveillance, declining DNA repair efficiency, and mitochondrial function. This framework positions delayed childbearing as a multifaceted genetic risk factor that extend beyond aneuploidy to include mutations and other genomic alterations that can impact intergenerational genetic risk.

Aneuploidy↗

Modeling and targeting general and chromosome-specific aneuploidy in cancer.

Throughout the last century, aneuploidy has been cemented as a hallmark of cancer. Although the association of aneuploidy with tumorigenesis has been well established, the role of these genetic imbalances in tumor formation has only recently begun to be elucidated. Advancements in genomics have revealed the complexity and context dependence of the effect of aneuploidy on cancer growth, while developments in genetic editing have allowed for proper modeling of specific aneuploidies. In this review, we discuss the key factors to consider when studying the role of aneuploidy in cancer and the tools that are available to do so. We then highlight recent studies that establish phenotypic contributions of aneuploidy to tumorigenicity. In particular, we highlight how general aneuploidy and chromosomal instability affect the tumor microenvironment and how specific chromosomal alterations, including the loss of chromosome 9p and the gain of chromosomes 8q and 1q, influence tumor behavior and therapeutic responses. Finally, we emphasize the potential of targeting aneuploidy-induced vulnerabilities to improve cancer treatment outcomes.

Aneuploidy↗