PubMed · 11432106
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H Chalfin, M Kellert. 2000. Microscopic surgery.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11432106/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Questionnaires were circulated to all Fellows of the British Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons in 1999, 75% of whom replied (n = 194). There was a wide range of responses for both the timing of review appointments and the taking of radiographs. Most patients were first followed up 1 week after operation (46%), but 38% were reviewed in the second week. Five surgeons did not review patients at all and two did not review until 6 or 9 months, respectively. Nearly two-thirds routinely offered a second follow-up appointment but only 14% offered more than two, the maximum being seven. Most arranged postoperative radio-graphs but the timing ranged from immediately postoperatively to 1 year after the procedure. Less than one-third requested a second postoperative radiograph between 1 month and 1 year. The largest disparity was in the time of discharge to the general dental practitioner, which ranged from immediately to 5 years, the most popular time of discharge being at 3 months. The wide variations may reflect unnecessary recall of patients and misuse of valuable clinical time.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a stainless steel (CT-5) and zirconium nitride coated (KiS) microsurgical ultrasonic instrument with regard to possible root-end fracture production during retropreparation. Forty extracted human central incisors were prepared in a crown-down fashion. Canals were obturated with gutta-percha by lateral condensation. Root-ends were resected. Teeth were placed in methylene blue for 48 h and evaluated by three independent evaluators under microscope. Teeth with existing fractures were eliminated from the study. The remaining teeth were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A was prepared with the CT-5 tip and Group B with the KiS tip. Preparation time was recorded for all roots. The teeth were again immersed in methylene blue for 48 h and reevaluated. No root-end fractures were produced by either the KiS or CT-5 microsurgical ultrasonic instruments.
Since the introduction of microsurgical principles in the 1990s, the field of endodontic surgery has made continuous and substantial progress. Particularly, root-end cavity preparation has been simplified and optimized by means of newly developed surgical microinstruments. However, the successful outcome of endodontic surgery depends to a large extent on accurate intraoperative diagnostics. Conventionally, micromirrors (retromirrors) and microprobes have been used for this purpose. Recently, the surgical microscope has been used to enhance visibility during dental procedures. In addition, endoscopy has been reported to provide the surgeon with outstanding vision and ease of use. This article describes the technical specifications and the diagnostic application of the endoscope during endodontic surgery.