PubMed · 11435638
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T R Gehrig, M H Sketch, J E Tcheng. 2001. No jacket required.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11435638/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The aim of the present study was to test for possible associations between candidate gene polymorphisms and the risk of restenosis and recurrent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) without stenting. We followed up 511 PTCA patients, and restenosis and recurrent restenosis were defined according to angiographical criteria. Genotyping of the beta-fibrinogen -455 G/A, glycoprotein (GP) IIIa PlA1/PlA2, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G, factor V Leiden 1691 G/A, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) -238 G/A, TNFalpha -308 G/A, interleukin (IL)-1alpha -889 C/T, IL-1beta -511 C/T, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677 C/T and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) 4 b/a gene polymorphisms was performed by PCR and restriction-fragment-length-polymorphism-based techniques. One hundred and sixty patients (31.3%) developed restenosis and in 130 of these patients, of whom 123 were available for analysis, a second PTCA without stenting was performed. Of these patients, 35 (28.5%) developed recurrent restenosis. None of the investigated genotypes were associated with the risk of restenosis or recurrent restenosis after PTCA. The degree of stenosis before and immediately after PTCA and the severity of the lesion were independent predictors for restenosis after PTCA. In conclusion, there was no association between the beta-fibrinogen -455 G/A, GP IIIa PlA1/A2, PAI-1 4G/5G, factor V Leiden 1691 G/A, TNFalpha -238 G/A, TNFalpha -308 G/A, IL-1alpha -889 C/T, the IL-1beta -511 C/T, MTHFR 677 C/T and eNOS 4 b/a gene polymorphisms and the risk of restenosis after PTCA as well as recurrent restenosis after repeated PTCA.
Genetic risk markers for coronary artery disease and associated phenotypes, such as restenosis after angioplasty, have the potential to be valuable to the individual, but even more so in facilitating an understanding of causal factors in the disease, and thereby the development of novel preventative and therapeutic strategies. In this issue of Clinical Science, Völzke and co-workers were unable to show association of a panel of candidate polymorphisms with restenosis, but their study has highlighted the need for even larger studies, as well as the potential benefits of finding causal genetic variation.
BACKGROUND: The benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over thrombolysis has been clearly demonstrated in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the best therapeutic strategy for a patient with AMI presenting to acute care services without catheterization facilities remains under debate. Our objective was to gather all available information from clinical trials comparing transfer of patients experiencing AMI for angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a meta-analysis of all data available from published randomized trials and from presentations in scientific sessions of major cardiology congresses comparing the 2 strategies. The primary end point was the combined criteria (CC) of death/reinfarction/stroke as defined in each trial. Relative risk (RR) evaluated the treatment effect. We identified 6 clinical trials including 3750 patients. Transfer time was always <3 hours. The CC was significantly reduced by 42% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29% to 53%, P<0.001) in the group transferred for primary PCI compared with the group receiving on-site thrombolysis. When CC parameters were considered separately, reinfarction was significantly reduced by 68% (95% CI, 34% to 84%; P<0.001) and stroke by 56% (95% CI, -15% to 77%; P=0.015). There was a trend toward reduction in all-cause mortality of 19% (95% CI, -3% to 36%; P=0.08) with transfer for PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Even when transfer to an angioplasty center is necessary, primary PCI remains superior to immediate thrombolysis. Organization of ambulance systems, prehospital management, and adequate PCI capacity appear now to be the key issues in providing reperfusion therapy for AMI.