PubMed · 11449949
Productive inventory and case/agreement contingencies: a methodological note on Rispoli (1999).
Abstract
Rispoli (1999) suggests that previous studies arguing for a contingency between the case of subject pronouns and the presence/absence of verbal agreement in the acquisition of English (e.g. Schütze, 1997) suffer from methodological problems, and presents new data that fail to support earlier findings. I show that Rispoli's methodology unnecessarily biases his study against finding the predicted contingencies: it fails to take account of children's productive lexical inventory of pronoun forms. As a result, syntactic versus morphological sources of error fail to be distinguished. I explain why this distinction is crucial within the AGR/Tense Omission Model, and clarify its predictions.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C T Schütze. 2001. Productive inventory and case/agreement contingencies: a methodological note on Rispoli (1999).. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000901004731
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.