Bladder augmentation techniques in women.

K G Niknejad; A Atala

doi:10.1007/s001920070043

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11484743

Bladder augmentation techniques in women.

K G Niknejad·A Atala

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Augmentation cystoplasty is performed in women for a variety of indications, including neurogenic bladder dysfunction, inflammatory diseases, small fibrosed bladders, idiopathic urge incontinence and enuresis. The preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques and postoperative management are reviewed. Complications of stone formation, urinary tract infections, mucus production, metabolic disturbances, hematuria and dysuria syndrome, tumors and perforations are addressed. In addition, alternative techniques such as ureterocystoplasty, autoaugmentation, seromuscular cystoplasty and the future of augmentation of the bladder utilizing techniques of tissue engineering are discussed. The management of pregnancy in women who have previously undergone augmentation cystoplasty is also reviewed.

Explore related subjects

Cecum Colon, Sigmoid Female Humans Ileum Postoperative Complications Plastic Surgery Procedures Stomach Urinary Bladder Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic Urologic Surgical Procedures Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

K G Niknejad, A Atala. 2000. Bladder augmentation techniques in women.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920070043

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Education and imaging. Gastrointestinal: cecal ileus.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Cecum↗

PubMed2006

[Pseudo-"isolated" intestinal perforation in a very low birth weight infant: exceptional presentation of Hirschsprung's disease].

Intestinal perforations in preterm newborn are characterized with high morbidity and mortality rates. They often are associated with necrotizing enterocolitis and seldom correspond to idiopathic spontaneous intestinal perforation. Perforations upstream of an intestinal organic obstruction (atresia), or of a functionnal obstruction (meconium-ileus, Hirschsprung disease) have been considered to be rare in preterm newborns. We report a case of caecal perforation with a pneumoperitoneum which occurred at 5 days of life, in a 28-week gestational age infant, that was treated by cecostomy. There were no signs of necrotizing enterocolitis. At 43 days of life, the preoperative contrast enema study revealed a left colon transition zone, suggesting a Hirschsprung disease, which was confirmed by rectal biopsies. Transanal pull-through was performed. There were no postoperative complication. This case demonstrates that an isolated intestinal perforation in very preterm newborn can reveal a Hirschsprung disease, especially if it occurs in the caecum.

Cecum↗

PubMed2006

Extended flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by colonoscopists for colorectal cancer screening: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Caecal intubation can be achieved by extended flexible sigmoidoscopy in 32% of patients. AIM: To assess the feasibility of extended flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by colonoscopists for colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: We enrolled 41 patients referred for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. After purging, examination was performed with a colonoscope. All patients completed sigmoidoscopy (success in meeting referral goal); 93% and 71% had examination to the transverse or ascending colon, and caecum, respectively. Overall yield and right-sided polyps was 56% and 27%, respectively. Caecal intubation and complete examination with polypectomy took 6.0 +/- 2.5 and 18.3 +/- 5.1 min, respectively; with no complications. Twelve patients requested colonoscope withdrawal because of discomfort. Although 46% reported moderate to severe discomfort, 39% and 36%, respectively, were definitely or probably willing to repeat flexible sigmoidoscopy. RESULTS: Unsedated colonoscopy introduced as extended flexible sigmoidoscopy emphasizes the benefits of added yield rather than the negative image of withholding of discomfort relief. The patient can choose to accept the equivalent of an unsedated colonoscopy or reject the option based on perceived discomfort during extended flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by the colonoscopist. CONCLUSION: Extended flexible sigmoidoscopy is a feasible option in carefully selected patients, fully prepared and by an experienced colonoscopist.

Cecum↗