PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11490652

Physicians and compliance: developing a system that works.

Abstract

This article will describe the development of a method to educate physicians and other health-care providers about the components of the Model Compliance Plan for Clinical Laboratories. It incorporates adult learning principles through the use of academic detailing and other educational tools. The improvement process and indicator data used by our health-care facility is outlined. Since the release of the Model Compliance Plan for Clinical Laboratories in 1997, it has been an ongoing challenge to meet its guidelines and develop processes to ensure compliance of medical necessity documentation and submission of accurate claims for Medicare reimbursement. Most laboratories have the appropriate policies and procedures in place to achieve effective compliance programs. However, the existence of a policy does not ensure compliance. In our organization, Mercy Medical Center-North Iowa, Mason City, Iowa, baseline data demonstrated the need for process improvement in the area of physician office compliance. Often, advance beneficiary notices or notices of non-coverage were nonexistent or incomplete; medical necessity documentation for the requested tests was inconsistent; and patient demographic information was incomplete. As a result, Medicare could not be billed and laboratory write-offs were at an unacceptable level. We will outline some of the compliance issues currently facing laboratories and describe the systems approach used to improve physician compliance in our system.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Eckhart, N Mathahs. Physicians and compliance: developing a system that works.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11490652/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical laboratory consultation: appropriateness to laboratory medicine.

New and expensive treatments, introduction of difficult to interpret complex tests, a greater reliance on nurse practitioners as deliverers of primary care and patient initiated testing, all make it likely that in the future greater emphasis will be placed on appropriate use of cost-effective laboratory tests. The most promising solution to inappropriate utilization of laboratory services is a greater reliance on clinical laboratory consultants. At present, many laboratory physicians and scientists cannot compete with specialist physicians in terms of the ability to provide credible helpful advice on test selection and results interpretation. Educational prerequisites to effective consultation are: understanding of disease pathogenesis, knowledge of clinical problem solving and identification with clinical questions. The latter requires clinical experience or intensive training in clinical laboratory consultation. Further barriers to implementation of comprehensive laboratory consultation services include resistance on the part of practicing physicians, health care administrators and insurers. Whether these barriers can be overcome or not, the future will include comprehensive laboratory consultation services conducted through web-based access to advice on test selection and interpretation of results.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗

Appropriateness in programs for continuous quality improvement in clinical laboratories.

BACKGROUND: External reviews and the accreditation of medical laboratories involve more than the mere assessment of conformance with standards for organisational processes. The new approaches to quality improvement suggest that, rather than using inspection to correct unusual errors, there should be more emphasis on improving the processes of health care to ensure that desired outcomes are produced. Appropriateness plays a key role in programs for quality improvement. METHODS: Appropriateness in laboratory medicine can be assessed, and improved, through the governance of the entire testing process. This begins with test selection, proceeds through valuable pre-, intra- and post-analytical procedures, and concludes by assuring the correct interpretation and utilization of laboratory information. RESULTS: The International Standard, specifically developed for medical laboratories (ISO 15189) recognizes the value of appropriate interpretation and advisory services, although it does not specify requirements for assessing appropriateness, requesting tests and interpreting results. The effectiveness of clinical laboratories can be assessed by using surrogate markers, which indicate physicians' satisfaction, and clinical audits. Effectiveness is also enhanced by stressing the importance of the technical and professional competence of evaluators. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate laboratory utilization unjustifiably increases health care costs, can harm patients and perpetuates the vision of laboratory testing as a commodity. Improvement in laboratory appropriateness can be achieved by seeking a better relationship with physicians and by stressing the role of laboratory specialists in providing clinical advice for the selection of laboratory tests, and the interpretation and utilization of their results, thus leading to more satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗

Application of the principles of evidence-based medicine to laboratory medicine.

The principles of evidence-based medicine and the consequent search for robust evidence on outcomes plays a central role in the practice of laboratory medicine. The core of the evidence lies in an explicit recognition of the clinical question(s) that the test result can address. Studies that focus on the relevant patient cohort and clinical setting for the test, and identify the appropriate outcome measure will generate information that can be used to guide use of the test, identify the benefits, and thereby support the case for investment of resources to deliver the service.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗