Sickle cell.

Abstract

The initiation of newborn screening and its virtually universal implementation will eventually yield a population in which sickle cell disease has been identified and comprehensive care is provided for children. The situation with SCT is different; there will continue to be the identification of parents who have the potential for having a child with a sickle cell disease but because they will not be tested or counseled, there will continue to be a population of children with a sickle cell disease whose parents have not been enabled to make informed decisions that they believe are in their best interest relative to family planning. Also, we will continue to have a population of pregnant women with a fetus with sickle cell disease who will not be given an opportunity to decide whether they wish to continue or terminate the pregnancy. They all will give birth to a child with a lifetime of chronic illness with its associated psychological, social, and financial burdens for the individual and his or her parents. The failure to implement prenatal diagnosis is an abridgment of two fundamental rights: the right to know and the right to decide. In this case it is the right to know about the potential health status of their children if that is possible, and the right to decide about the actual health care status of their children if options are available.