[The effectiveness of implementing an unit-based shared governance model].

Abstract

The purpose of the nonequivalent control group study was to establish a regional unit-based shared governance model. Fifty-three subjects distributing to experimental (n = 29) and control (n = 24) groups-age, working years, and education were matched statistically-were selected by "purposeful sampling" of Index of Professional Nurse Governance pretest mean scores from six units at a nursing department. Based on Martin's "systematic" evaluation model for shared governance, the study collected: (1) manager's and staff's perception of existing governance using open-ended questions, (2) measure of organizational efficiency using the IPNG and the Index of Working Satisfaction, and (3) the research team's assessment of the unit's willingness to continue this model in the future. The reliability and validity of the questionnaires were established. Intervention of the model was approximately four months, including: preparatory and evaluating phase: data was collected; educative phase: empowering managers and staff were educated in the shared governance concepts; implementing phase: shared governance team was built up. Two-tailed t and chi 2 tests were used to detect differences between the two groups. Results showed, after establishing the unit-based model, (1) an increase in the nursing professional governance and work satisfaction among nurses; (2) an enhanced partnership between managers and nurses; (3) staff nurses perceived increased autonomy, authority, and more frequently expressed their opinions to managers; (4) managers perceived their staff to have more potential competence, then task pushed effectively. The findings suggest that managers and nurses need to refine their professional roles based on the organizational mission, as well as to expand nurses' representation and participation in current organization-wide committees by trust and full delegation from their managers.