PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11572255

Surgical program for craniosynostosis using three-dimensional solid model, combined with autologous blood transfusion in a Japanese craniofacial unit.

Abstract

Since April 1997 at St. Mary's Craniofacial Unit, simulated surgery using a three-dimensional solid model made preoperatively was carried out, which enable sufficient autologous blood banking before the surgery. This study was conducted in eight patients presenting with plagiocephaly, brachycephaly, and oxycephaly consisting of simple craniosynostosis and syndromic craniosynostosis. Four cases (numbers 1-4) conducted with simulated surgery using three-dimensional solid models and fronto-orbital advancement with reshaping, as well as autologous blood transfusion were selected for the later-term group. For the first-term group, four cases (numbers 5-8) that were performed before the introduction of the abovementioned treatment were selected. The later-term group compared with the first-term group showed a decrease in operating time by an average of 1 hour, blood loss during surgery by 90 ml, and one fifth the amount of homologous blood transfusion. Also, 2 cases in the later-term group (cases 3 and 4) were able to avoid homologous blood transfusion, and they had autologous blood transfusion of 30 to 33 ml/kg. The surgical techniques will be improved with repeated cases of simulated surgery, aiming for the minimum invasive surgery. Also, the use of autologous blood transfusion is expected to increase as a less invasive surgery.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Uemura, T Hayashi, Y Furukawa, N Mitsukawa, A Yoshikawa, T Jinnai. 2001. Surgical program for craniosynostosis using three-dimensional solid model, combined with autologous blood transfusion in a Japanese craniofacial unit.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200109000-00015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer death. A randomized study was performed on patients with localized prostate cancer and treated with radical prostatectomy using the perineal or the retropubic approach comparing oncological outcomes, cancer control, and functional results. STUDY DESIGN: Between 1997 and 2004, in a randomized study 200 patients underwent a radical prostatectomy performed by retropubic (100 patients) or perineal (100 patients) approach. RESULTS: Differences between hospital stay, duration of catheter drainage, intraoperative blood loss, and transfusion requirements were statistically significant in favor of perineal prostatectomy. Differences between positive surgical margins and urinary continence in the two groups were not statistically significant at 6 and 24 months. Differences between erectile function at 24 months were statistically significant in favor of retropubic prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Radical perineal prostatectomy is an excellent alternative approach for radical surgery in the treatment of early prostate cancer.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

Bipolar pulse coagulation for resection of the cirrhotic liver.

BACKGROUND: The major technical challenge of liver surgery is controlling bleeding during transection of the parenchyma. The Gyrus hand piece (GHP) is a bipolar diathermy pulsation instrument that is similar in design to a large hemostat (Péan) clamp that divides tissue while the clamp remains closed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the peri-operative data from 10 patients with early cirrhosis (stage 1-4) who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular cancer between February 2004 and July 2005. Five consecutive patients who underwent resection using the GHP were compared to five other patients who underwent resection using the traditional "crush clamp technique" (CCT). Six patients underwent minor hepatectomy (<3 segments) and four underwent major hepatectomy (>3 segments). RESULTS: When the GHP was used, the mean Pringle time was 13 +/- 5 min, mean blood loss was 520 mL +/- 118, and mean operative time was 252 +/- 15 min. When the CCT was used, the average Pringle time was 13 +/- 3 min, mean blood loss was 630 +/- 67 mL, and mean operative time was 312 +/- 29 min. There were 2 major complications in the GHP group and 3 in the CCT group. Major complications included transient hepatic failure (i.e., ascites/encephalopathy) and biloma formation. CONCLUSIONS: One patient from each group suffered a minor wound complication. The average hospital stay was 8 days (range, 6-9) for the GHP group, and 8 days (range, 7-10) for CCT group. The operative mortality rate was 0%. Our preliminary results demonstrate that GHP provides an excellent and safe alternative to CCT for dividing the liver parenchyma in cirrhotic patients.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗