PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11590640

Unifying linear prior-information-driven methods for accelerated image acquisition.

Abstract

In the ongoing quest for faster imaging and higher spatial resolution, several methods have been developed to speed up data acquisition by incorporating prior information about the object being imaged. This study shows that many of these methods can be integrated into a single common equation. The unified framework provides a conceptual link that facilitates comparison among these methods to reveal their strengths and weaknesses. By considering the limitations of existing methods, a new member in this class of methods was developed. The broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique (BLAST) uses the estimated amount of change within the FOV as prior information. BLAST has the flexibility of incorporating a variable amount of prior information to avoid the misleading appearance of "phantom features," which arise from overconstraining the reconstruction. Examples from dynamic imaging and MR thermometry are shown.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Tsao, B Behnia, A G Webb. 2001. Unifying linear prior-information-driven methods for accelerated image acquisition.. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1242

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Infrared ear thermometry compared with rectal thermometry in children: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Infrared ear thermometry is frequently used in children, because this is a quick method of taking temperature and the ear is easily accessible. Our aim was to evaluate agreement between temperature measured at the rectum and ear in children. METHODS: We did a systematic review of studies comparing temperature measured at the rectum (the reference site) using mercury, electronic, or indwelling probe thermometers, with temperature measured at the ear (the test site) using infrared ear thermometers. Heterogeneity between studies was investigated by exploring subgroups according to the mode of the infrared ear thermometer. FINDINGS: 44 studies containing 58 comparisons (5935 children) were eligible for inclusion in this review. Outcome data were available in reports from 12 comparisons (2312 [39%] children), and data on individual patients were obtained for a further 19 comparisons (2129 [36%] children). 31 comparisons (4441 [75%] children) were therefore included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean temperature difference (rectal minus ear) was 0.29 degrees C (95% limits of agreement -0.74 to 1.32). We pooled data by ear device mode and the mean temperature differences were rectal mode 0.15 degrees C (-0.95 to 1.25), actual 0.70 degrees C (-0.20 to 1.60), core 0.25 degrees C (-0.78 to 1.27), oral 0.34 degrees C (-0.86 to 1.54), tympanic 0.62 degrees C (-0.40 to 1.64) and mode not stated 0.32 degrees C (-0.57 to 1.21). There was significant residual heterogeneity in both mean differences and sample SDs within the groups of ear device mode. INTERPRETATION: Although the mean differences between rectal and ear temperature measurements were small, the wide limits of agreement mean that ear temperature is not a good approximation of rectal temperature, even when the ear thermometer is used in rectal mode. Our finding suggests that infrared ear thermometry does not show sufficient agreement with an established method of temperature measurement to be used in situations where body temperature needs to be measured with precision.

Body Temperature↗

[Thermometry].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Body Temperature↗