PubMed · 11627552
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G Weindling. 1976. [Not Available].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11627552/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Chronic alcohol consumption is a risk factor for osteoporosis and inhibits osseous repair and regeneration. We investigated the hypothesis that chronic ethanol exposure induces the expression of TNF-alpha and/or IL-1beta and inhibits proliferation during distraction osteogenesis (DO). Following six weeks of liquid diet infusion (+/-ethanol) and 14 days of DO, the expression of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta in the distraction gap and contralateral femoral marrow of adult male rats was examined by immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR, respectively. In the bone marrow, the expression of both TNF-alpha and IL-1beta mRNA was significantly increased by ethanol (p<0.04 for both). In the DO gap, ethanol exposure increased the expression of TNF-alpha in both the fibrous interzone and primary matrix front (PMF), while IL-1beta expression was not significantly affected in either region. A negative correlation was found between the percentage of PCNA+ and TNF+ cells in the PMF (p<0.015, R(2)=0.655). Incubation of MC3T3-E1 cells with ethanol for 24 or 48 h produced a time and dose dependent two- to fourfold increase in TNF-alpha transcripts as measured by RT-PCR, demonstrating that ethanol can directly induce TNF-alpha expression in osteoblast-like cells. These results support the hypothesis that attenuation of bone formation by ethanol may be mediated, in part, by local increases in TNF-alpha during osteogenesis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of programmes of screening in general practice for excessive alcohol use and providing brief interventions. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that used screening as a precursor to brief intervention. SETTING: General practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number needed to treat, proportion of patients positive on screening, proportion given brief interventions, and effect of screening. RESULTS: The eight studies included for meta-analysis all used health questionnaires for screening, and the brief interventions included feedback, information, and advice. The studies contained several sources of bias that might lead to overestimates of the effects of intervention. External validity was compromised because typically three out of four people identified by screening as excessive users of alcohol did not qualify for the intervention after a secondary assessment. Overall, in 1000 screened patients, 90 screened positive and required further assessment, after which 25 qualified for brief intervention; after one year 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 3.4) reported they drank less than the maximum recommended level. CONCLUSIONS: Although even brief advice can reduce excessive drinking, screening in general practice does not seem to be an effective precursor to brief interventions targeting excessive alcohol use. This meta-analysis raises questions about the feasibility of screening in general practice for excessive use of alcohol.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.