PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11630084

[Not Available].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Kivalo. 1992. [Not Available].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11630084/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Promoter region polymorphism of the CD14 gene (C-159T) is not associated with psoriasis vulgaris.

Keratinocytes of psoriatic skin show aberrant expression of membrane-bound CD14 (mCD14). In addition, soluble CD14 (sCD14) is elevated in the sera of psoriatic patients. The mechanisms leading to increased CD14 expression and secretion in psoriasis are poorly understood. A bi-allelic polymorphism in the promoter region of the CD14 gene controls CD14 expression on monocytes and sCD14 levels in the sera of healthy subjects. In this context, we explored the CD14 promoter region genotypes of 63 Finnish patients with psoriasis and 126 non-psoriatic controls using a new ARMS-PCR method. No differences in the CD14 genotype frequencies were found between the groups. Thus, our results suggest that the enhanced CD14 expression in psoriasis is not attributable to functional variants of CD14 (-159C/T).

Finland↗

Expert supervisors' views of clinical supervision: a study of factors promoting and inhibiting the achievements of multiprofessional team supervision.

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies are available of team supervision and its challenges to supervisors. A multiprofessional team supervision project was accomplished in 1995-1998 in one university hospital in Finland. Eighty-two practitioners from five wards participated in the project and 10 experienced supervisors implemented their team supervision. AIM: The aim of this qualitative study is to describe the experiences of five supervisor pairs (n=10) of multiprofessional team supervision. METHODS: Data were collected by semi-structured interviews from the supervisor pairs. The interviewing style was open and followed that of a guided conversation between supervisors and researcher. Interview data were analysed using thematic content analysis. FINDINGS: The factors that influenced team supervision were as follows: advanced knowledge of supervision and confidence in supervisors, commitment and motivation, interaction and collaborative relationships and the arrangements of team supervision. The positive effects of team supervision as identified by the supervisors were as follows: influence on interaction and human relationships in the work community, supervisees' strengthened professional identity and the development of multiprofessional practice. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors can promote or inhibit the achievements of team supervision. Regardless of all the difficulties related to team supervision, its effects on a work community are positive. For the supervisors, team supervision is a demanding and challenging but also a rewarding process.

Finland↗

Dietary interventions in Finland, Norway and Sweden: nutrition policies and strategies.

AIMS: To describe the organization and implementation of nutrition policies, and examine intervention strategies for dietary change in three Scandinavian countries. METHODS: Descriptions of nutrition policies and dietary intervention strategies are based on published nutrition policy research and reports. RESULTS: All countries studied have adopted formal nutrition policies. Norway issued its first white paper in 1976, the Finnish National Nutrition Council published an action plan in 1989, and the Swedish Government issued an official action plan in 1995. Norway has a centralized National Nutrition Council with a permanent administration whereas the responsibilities and administration are more spread out between several authorities and groups in Finland and Sweden. Amongst the dietary intervention strategies employed, a Norwegian nutrition campaign, symbol labelling of foods in Sweden, the community-based North Karelia Project in Finland, and mass catering in Finland and Sweden have been selected as potentially transferable. CONCLUSIONS: Policy documents serve as guidelines for activities and assist in achieving dietary targets. A responsible administrative body with advice from a standing expert committee is valuable for implementation. Guidelines, recommendations or voluntary labelling standards can be incentives to product development and changes to food production. Regional demonstration projects may also encourage action and collaboration.

Finland↗