PubMed · 11651505
Bayer revisited.
Abstract
Bayer accuses me of wrongly claiming that he holds a negative thesis about the role that the liberal emphasis on privacy rights has had on AIDS public health policy. In his reply to my review essay, he denies holding such a thesis and, moreover, makes the stronger claim that his position is sympathetic to liberalism, or at least to some versions of it. Although I appreciate Bayer's efforts to clarify his views about liberalism and a "culture of restraint and responsibility", it is clear to me that our differences are related not to a misunderstanding on my part, but to a fundamental disagreement concerning what liberalism as a political philosophy is, and what public policy implications it entails in the case of AIDS....
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Patricia Illingworth. 1992. Bayer revisited.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.1992.tb00181.x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.