PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11706649

Do untreated bednets protect against malaria?

Abstract

Bednets are thought to offer little, if any, protection against malaria, unless treated with insecticide. There is also concern that the use of untreated nets will cause people sleeping without nets to receive more mosquito bites, and thus increase the malaria risk for other community members. Regular retreatment of nets is therefore viewed as critical for malaria control. However, despite good uptake of nets, many control programmes in Africa have reported low re-treatment rates. We investigated whether untreated bednets had any protective benefit (in October and November 1996) in The Gambia where nets, although widely used, are mostly untreated. Cross-sectional prevalence surveys were carried out in 48 villages and the risk of malaria parasitaemia was compared in young children sleeping with or without nets. Use of an untreated bednet in good condition was associated with a significantly lower prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum infection (51% protection [95% CI 34-64%], P < 0.001). This finding was only partly explained by differences in wealth between households, and children in the poorest households benefited most from sleeping under an untreated net (62% protection [14-83%], P = 0.018). There was no evidence that mosquitoes were diverted to feed on children sleeping without nets. These findings suggest that an untreated net, provided it is in relatively good condition, can protect against malaria. Control programmes should target the poorest households as they may have the most to gain from using nets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S E Clarke, C Bøgh, R C Brown, M Pinder, G E Walraven, S W Lindsay. Do untreated bednets protect against malaria?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-9203(01)90001-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Natural cellulose fibers from switchgrass with tensile properties similar to cotton and linen.

We report the production and characteristics of natural cellulose fibers obtained from the leaves and stems of switchgrass. In this paper, the composition, structure and properties of fibers obtained from the leaves and stem of switchgrass have been studied in comparison to the common natural cellulose fibers, such as cotton, linen and kenaf. The leaves and stems of switchgrass have tensile properties intriguingly similar to that of linen and cotton, respectively. Fibers were obtained from the leaves and stems of switchgrass using a simple alkaline extraction and the structure and properties of the fibers were studied. Fibers obtained from switchgrass leaves have crystallinity of 51%, breaking tenacity of 5.5 g per denier (715 MPa) and breaking elongation of 2.2% whereas the corresponding values for fibers obtained from switchgrass stems are 46%, 2.7 g per denier and 6.8%, respectively. Switchgrass is a relatively easy to grow and high yield biomass crop that can be source to partially substitute the natural and synthetic fibers currently in use. We hope that this research will stimulate interests in using switchgrass as a novel fiber crop in addition to being promoted as a potential source for biofuels.

Bedding and Linens↗

Efficacy of forced-air warming systems with full body blankets.

PURPOSE: Postoperative hypothermia after cardiac surgery is still a common problem often treated with forced-air warming. This study was conducted to determine the heat transfer efficacy of 11 forced-air warming systems with full body blankets on a validated copper manikin. METHODS: The following systems were tested: 1) Bair Hugger 505; 2) Bair Hugger 750; 3) Life-Air 1000 S; 4) Snuggle Warm; 5) Thermacare; 6) Thermacare with reusable Optisan blanket; 7) WarmAir; 8) Warm-Gard; 9) Warm-Gard and reusable blanket; 10) WarmTouch; and 11) WarmTouch and reusable blanket. Heat transfer of forced-air warmers can be described as follows: Q = h x DeltaT x A. Where Q = heat flux (W), h = heat exchange coefficient (W x m-2 x degrees C-1), DeltaT = temperature gradient between blanket and manikin surface (degrees C), A = covered area (m2). Heat flux per unit area and surface temperature were measured with 16 heat flux transducers. Blanket temperature was measured using 16 thermocouples. The temperature gradient between blanket and surface (DeltaT) was varied and h was determined by linear regression analysis. Mean DeltaT was determined for surface temperatures between 32 degrees C and 38 degrees C. The covered area was estimated to be 1.21 m2. RESULTS: For the 11 devices, heat transfers of 30.7 W to 77.3 W were observed for surface temperatures of 32 degrees C, and between -8.8 W to 29.6 W for surface temperatures of 38 degrees C. CONCLUSION: There are clinically relevant differences between the tested forced-air warming systems with full body blankets. Several systems were unable to transfer heat to the manikin at a surface temperature of 38 degrees C.

Bedding and Linens↗