PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11750241

Introduction.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M L Blute, S J Jacobsen, S A Kaplan, F C Lowe, M P O'Leary, W D Steers, C G Roehrborn. 2001. Introduction.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01536-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Solid phase transition of CS-891 enantiotropes during grinding.

The physical properties of N-[1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-methylethyl]-3-oxo-4-aza-5a-androst-1-ene-17beta-carboxamide (CS-891), a novel and orally effective testosterone 5-reductase inhibitor, were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, powder X-ray diffraction at elevated temperature and single crystal X-ray crystallography. CS-891 was revealed to exist as two enantiotropic forms, a low-temperature stable form (Form A) and a high-temperature stable form (Form B) which reversibly transforms to Form A at around 58 degrees C. The effect of grinding temperature on the transition of CS-891 between the amorphous and the crystalline state during grinding of the eantiotropes was examined. Form A transformed into an amorphous form during the grinding process while the product temperature was kept below the transition temperature. On the other hand, when the product temperature during grinding reached above the transition temperature, Form A transformed into an amorphous form and some of the amorphous form converted back to Form B. Form B crystallized from the amorphous form was physically stable even at below the transition temperature. The amorphous form in equilibrium with Form B exhibited remarkable physical stability in comparison with the amorphous form obtained by continued grinding below the transition temperature.

5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors↗

Impact of a novel neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormone-deprivation approach on quality of life, voiding function, and sexual function after prostate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: Data demonstrate a benefit from neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormone-deprivation therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in patients who are treated with radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma; however, this approach has detrimental effects on quality of life (QOL). A cross-sectional study was undertaken to evaluate the impact on QOL, voiding function, and sexual function of an alternative hormone-deprivation approach. METHODS: Three hundred fifty patients with clinical T1c-T2b prostate carcinoma were treated from March 1997 to August 2000 either with palladium 103 brachytherapy (BTM) without hormone therapy or with 8 months of adjuvant and neoadjuvant hormone-deprivation therapy with an antiandrogen and finasteride (BTM+H), were mailed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) global well being QOL instrument (FACT-G), the American Urological Association symptom score (AUASS), and specific items addressing urinary control and sexual function from validated instruments. Differences between treatment groups were assessed as a function of time since treatment. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of patients responded to the questionnaire. No differences in overall FACT-G scores, AUASS scores, or AUASS subscale scores between the BTM group and the BTM+H group were found. The BTM+H group initially had lower personal well being FACT-G subscale scores, more urinary incontinence, and lower odds of attaining an erection sufficient for intercourse initially, although these differences disappeared with longer follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant antiandrogen and finasteride with brachytherapy is associated with QOL equal to that of brachytherapy alone for the treatment of patients with localized prostate carcinoma, allowing the advantages of hormone manipulation in terms of tumor control without its downside.

5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors↗