PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11848599

Semantic processing in visual word recognition: activation blocking and domain specificity.

Abstract

Lexical decision to a target is typically facilitated when a related prime is simply read, but is typically eliminated if subjects carry out a letter search on the prime when probe and prime appear simultaneously. Three experiments involving the addition of a task-irrelevant word to this prime search paradigm address (1) Stolz and Besner's (1996, 1998) account in which semantic priming is eliminated because letter search on the prime instantiates an activation block between lexical and semantic levels of representation, (2) Chiappe, Smith, and Besner's (1996) account that activation blocking is domain specific, and (3) Neely and Kahan's (2001) claim that semantic activation is context independent and capacity free. The results are (1) consistent with the account that activation blocking is general to a level, rather than item specific, (2) consistent with the account that activation blocking is domain specific, and (3) inconsistent with the claim that semantic activation is context independent and capacity free.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M S Brown, M A Roberts, D Besner. 2001. Semantic processing in visual word recognition: activation blocking and domain specificity.. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196217

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Modeling associative recognition: a comparison of two-high-threshold, two-high-threshold signal detection, and mixture distribution models.

A 2-high-threshold signal detection (HTSDT) model, a mixture distribution (SON) model, and 2-high-threshold (HT) models with responses distributed over 1 or several response categories were fit to results of 6 experiments from 2 studies on associative recognition: R. Kelley and J. T. Wixted (2001) and A. P. Yonelinas (1997). HTSDT assumes that associative recognition is based on conscious recollection and familiarity assessment, whereas according to SON and HT, associative information results in a shift of familiarity. The modeling results cast doubt on the prominent role of conscious recollection, and as far as models are valid, parameter estimation suggests 2 processes in associative recognition: a shift in familiarity that is due to associative information and the determination of the source of familiarity of pairs.

Association↗