[Bioethics in genetic engineering].

César Gutiérrez-Samperio

PubMed · 11885124

[Bioethics in genetic engineering].

Abstract

The advances in the field of molecular biology and genetics have widened the possibilities for the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary diseases. At the same time research into this field has broken bounds of its legal and ethical regulation. The intention of this paper is not to analyze these advances from scientific and technical point of view which is the area of the specialist, but rather to review historical antecedents of genetic engineering; the legal and ethical repercussions of the human genome project (HGP); in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (FIVET); the embryo research which is being caused out and which may be possible; other fields of genetics and cloning especially germinal cells and human beings; genetic diagnosis and its family, social and work repercussions; treatment through genetic engineering, research into cloning in order to obtain organs and tissues for transplants; and the use of genetic engineering in the biomedical industry. To avoid these advances working against humans, the organization and participation of multidisciplinary bodies are required to provide legal and ethical supervision.

Explore related subjects

Bioethical Issues Cloning, Organism Embryo Transfer Fertilization in Vitro Genetic Engineering Human Genome Project Humans Industry Research English Abstract Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

César Gutiérrez-Samperio. [Bioethics in genetic engineering].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11885124/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Medical science, culture, and truth.

There is a fairly closed circle between culture, language, meaning, and truth such that the world of a given culture is a world understood in terms of the meanings produced in that culture. Medicine is, in fact, a subculture of a powerful type and has its own language and understanding of the range of illnesses that affect human beings. So how does medicine get at the truth of people and their ills in such a way as to escape its own limited constructions? There is a way out of the closed circle implicit in the idea of a praxis and the engagement with reality that is central to it and the further possibility introduced by Jacques Lacan that signification is never comprehensive in relation to the subject's encounter with the real. I will explore both of these so as to develop a conception of truth that is apt for the knowledge that arises in the clinic.

Bioethical Issues↗

PubMed2006

Is the instrumentalization of humans acceptable in contemporary science?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Bioethical Issues↗

PubMed2006

The practice of health care: wisdom as a model.

Reasoning and judgement in health care entail complex responses to problems whose demands typically derive from several areas of specialism at once. We argue that current evidence- or value-based models of health care reasoning, despite their virtues, are insufficient to account for responses to such problems exhaustively. At the same time, we offer reasons for contending that health professionals in fact engage in forms of reasoning of a kind described for millennia under the concept of wisdom. Wisdom traditions refer to forms of deliberation which combine knowledge, reflection and life experience with social, emotional and ethical capacities. Wisdom is key in dealing with problems which are vital to human affairs but lack prescribed solutions. Uncertainty and fluidity must be tolerated in seeking to resolve them. We illustrate the application of wisdom using cases in psychiatry, where non-technical aspects of problems are often prominent and require more systematic analysis than conventional approaches offer, but we argue that our thesis applies throughout the health care field. We argue for the relevance of a threefold model of reasoning to modern health care situations in which multifaceted teamwork and complex settings demand wise judgement. A model based on practical wisdom highlights a triadic process with features activating capacities of the self (professional), other (patient and/or carers and/or colleagues) and aspects of the problem itself. Such a framework could be used to develop current approaches to health care based on case review and experiential learning.

Bioethical Issues↗