PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11893124

Occlusion junctions do not improve stereoacuity.

Abstract

Occlusion geometry gives rise to interocular shifts in the positions of binocularly viewed contour junctions. Since these shifts do not give rise to normal binocular disparities, they have been called 'pseudodisparities'. Previous work has shown that the unmatched contour segments of a partially occluded contour at occlusion junctions can be used to recover the geometry of the occluding surface through the construction of 'illusory' contours. Here, experiments were performed to determine whether such junction shifts could enhance stereoscopic depth detection when the relative disparity between the contours was below threshold. Our results showed that stereoscopic depth detection does not improve when pseudodisparity is present. We conclude that the visual system is less sensitive to pseudodisparity than to conventional disparity information. We suggest that the primary role of pseudodisparity is to overcome conditions of camouflage.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R van Ee, B L Anderson, H Farid. 2001. Occlusion junctions do not improve stereoacuity.. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685680152692006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding.

In a recall-based spoken production experiment, native English-speaking participants' variable use of the complementiser that to introduce the sentential complement in sentences like Henry knew (that) Lucy/Louise washed the dishes was found to be related to whether that inclusion/omission resulted in an alternating sequence of stressed and unstressed syllables between the verb of the main clause and the subject of the complement clause. This finding is discussed in relation to the question of whether and how phonological encoding can influence grammatical encoding in spoken language production.

Cues↗

Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth.

Repeated statements receive higher truth ratings than new statements. Given that repetition leads to greater experienced processing fluency, the author proposes that fluency is used in truth judgments according to its ecological validity. Thus, the truth effect occurs because people learn that fluency and truth tend to be positively correlated. Three experiments tested this notion. Experiment 1 replicated the truth effect by directly manipulating processing fluency; Experiment 2 reversed the effect by manipulating the correlation between fluency and truth in a learning phase. Experiment 3 generalized this reversal by showing a transfer of a negative correlation between perceptual fluency (due to color contrast) and truth to truth judgments when fluency is due to prior exposure (i.e., repetition).

Cues↗