PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11893321

[Swinging heart].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Francisco Marín Ortuño, Clara Oliver Navarrete, Juan Luján Martínez. 2002. [Swinging heart].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-8932(02)76598-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Pancreatic carcinoma versus chronic focal pancreatitis: contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography findings.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the potential usefulness of contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography (US) for differentiating pancreatic carcinoma from chronic focal pancreatitis. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with ductal carcinoma (n=16) and chronic focal pancreatitis (n=10) underwent power Doppler US examinations before and after intravenous injection of an air-based contrast agent (Levovist, Schering, Berlin, Germany). Final diagnosis was obtained by surgery in all patients. The following parameters before and after intravenous administration of contrast agent were evaluated for each lesion: number, morphology and course of the vessels within the lesion and time to maximum detectable enhancement. Number of the lesion vessels and time to maximum enhancement for each lesion were compared by with Student t test. RESULTS: After injection of contrast agent, nine of 16 (56.2%) carcinomas showed a larger total number of vessels (p<0.005) and faster enhancement (p<0.0001) compared with chronic focal pancreatitis. Irregular vessels with a serpiginous course that penetrated the tumor was predominant in carcinoma (eight of 16 cases), whereas focal pancreatitis presented mostly as avascular masses (five of 10 cases). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced power Doppler US provides useful findings for differentiating pancreatic carcinoma from chronic focal pancreatitis.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Primary epithelial lung malignancies in the pediatric population.

BACKGROUND: Primary epithelial lung malignancies are rare in childhood and adolescence. We reviewed the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience with these tumors to better understand their histology, time to diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. PROCEDURE: A retrospective review was performed on all patients 21 years of age or younger at diagnosis, treated for primary epithelial lung malignancies at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1980 and 2001. RESULTS: We identified 11 patients with primary epithelial lung malignancy. The median age at diagnosis was 19 (range: 12-21) years. The most common radiographic abnormality was a mass (55%) on chest imaging. Seven patients (64%) were initially diagnosed as having pneumonia which contributed to a delay in diagnosis. Final pathologic diagnoses included adenocarcinoma (four), carcinoid tumor (three typical, one atypical), basaloid carcinoma (two), and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (one). A majority of patients presented with advanced disease (two stage III, four stage IV). Patients with localized disease were treated with surgical resection and all but one remains disease free with a median follow-up of 60 months (range: 13-286). Patients with either advanced locoregional or distant metastatic disease were treated with multimodal therapy and a majority had rapid progression of disease. CONCLUSIONS: When children and adolescents present with primary epithelial lung malignancy a majority will have advanced disease and experience a delay in diagnosis. The histologic types of tumors encountered are similar to lung tumors occurring in adults, although the frequency of the various types differs. Carcinoid tumors are more frequent, and less common subtypes of bronchogenic carcinoma are also more prevalent in the pediatric age group. Similar to the adult population, the prognosis of these tumors is dependent on histology and stage. Patients with carcinoid tumors seem to have the best prognosis, followed by adenocarcinoma. The highly aggressive basaloid carcinoma has the worst.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Tumor suppressor gene Runx3 sensitizes gastric cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs by downregulating Bcl-2, MDR-1 and MRP-1.

The Runx3 gene is a member of the runt domain family transcription factors, key regulators of development and differentiation in metazoan. Recently, Runx3 was identified as a tumor suppressor gene. Loss of Runx3 was found to be associated with genesis and progression of gastric cancer. In this study, we transfected the gastric cancer cell line SGC7901 with eukaryotic expression vector of Runx3. In vitro drug sensitivity assay suggested that SGC7901/Runx3 cells were more sensitive to various chemotherapeutic drugs. Blocking Runx3 expression in immortalized stomach mucosal cells (GES-1) or gastric cancer cells (SGC7901) by Runx3-specific small interfering RNA conferred the cells resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. Flow cytometry examination suggested that expression of Runx3 in gastric cancer cells increased the intracellular accumulation and retention of adriamycin. Semiquantitative RT-PCR and Western blot suggested that Runx3 downregulated expression of Bcl-2, MDR-1 (P-gp) and MRP-1. Binding of Runx3 to promoter sequences of Bcl-2, MDR-1 and MRP-1 gene was detected by eletrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and supershift EMSA. We cloned the MDR-1 and MRP-1 gene promoters containing Runx binding sites and constructed the luciferase reporter vectors of these 2 promoters. Luciferase reporter assay suggested that Runx3 inhibited the promoter activity of the MDR-1 and MRP-1 promoter in SGC7901 cells. Taken together, our findings suggested that overexpression of Runx3 could sensitize gastric cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs by downregulating the Bcl-2, MDR-1 and MRP-1.

Adenocarcinoma↗