PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11897882

Exercise immunology: nutritional countermeasures.

D C Nieman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In contrast to moderate physical activity, prolonged and intensive exertion causes numerous changes in immunity that reflect physiologic stress and suppression, and an increased risk of upper respiratory tract infection. Enzymes in immune cells require the presence of micronutrients, leading to attempts by investigators to alter changes in immunity following heavy exertion through use of nutritional supplements, primarily zinc, dietary fat, vitamin C and other antioxidants, glutamine, and carbohydrate. Except for carbohydrate supplementation, none of these nutrients has emerged as an effective countermeasure to exercise-induced immunosuppression. Data from several studies of endurance athletes suggest that carbohydrate compared to placebo ingestion is associated with an attenuated cortisol, growth hormone, and epinephrine response to heavy exertion, fewer perturbations in blood immune cell counts, lower granulocyte and monocyte phagocytosis and oxidative burst activity, and a diminished pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine response. Overall, the hormonal and immune responses to carbohydrate compared to placebo ingestion during intensive exercise suggest that physiologic stress and inflammation are diminished, although clinical significance awaits further research.

Explore related subjects

Dietary CarbohydratesDietary SupplementsExerciseHumansImmune ToleranceNeutrophilsPhysical EndurancePhysical FitnessRespiratory Tract InfectionsSportsJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D C Nieman. 2001. Exercise immunology: nutritional countermeasures.. https://doi.org/10.1139/h2001-041

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

The changing roles of dietary carbohydrates: from simple to complex.

The dietary recommendations made for carbohydrate intake by many organizations/agencies have changed over time. Early recommendations were based on the need to ensure dietary sufficiency and focused on meeting micronutrient intake requirements. Because carbohydrate-containing foods are a rich source of micronutrients, starches, grains, fruits, and vegetables became the foundation of dietary guidance, including the base of the US Department of Agriculture's Food Guide Pyramid. Dietary sufficiency recommendations were followed by recommendations to reduce cholesterol levels and the risk for cardiovascular disease; reduction in total fat (and hence saturated fat) predominated. Beginning in the 1970s, carbohydrates were recommended as the preferred substitute for fat by the American Heart Association and others to achieve the recommended successive reductions in total fat and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Additional research on fats and fatty acids found that monounsaturated fatty acids could serve as an alternative substitution for saturated fats, providing equivalent lowering of LDL-C without concomitant reductions in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increases in triglycerides witnessed when carbohydrates replace saturated fat. This research led to a sharper focus in the guidelines in the 1990s toward restricting saturated fat and liberalizing a range of intake of total fat. Higher-fat diets, still low in saturated fatty acids, became alternative strategies to lower-fat diets. As the population has become increasingly overweight and obese, the emergence of the metabolic syndrome and its associated disruptions in glucose and lipid metabolism has led to reconsiderations of the role of carbohydrate-containing foods in the American diet. Consequently, a review of the evidence for and against high-carbohydrate diets is important to put this controversy into perspective. The current dietary recommendations for carbohydrate intake are supported by the evidence.

Dietary Carbohydrates↗
PubMed2006

[Eating during labour: is it of any benefit?].

Fasting during labour is questioned in France despite the historical recommendations by Curtis Mendelson. Solid food diet increases maternal nausea and vomiting of non digested food associated with a theoretical risk of severe aspiration syndrome. Clear fluids may improve the comfort of some parturients but it remains uncertain whether or not the obstetric consequences (i.e. duration of labour, Caesarean section rate) of carbohydrate supplementation are beneficial.

Dietary Carbohydrates↗