PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11924952

Teething troubles?

Abstract

The relationship between the eruption of the deciduous teeth and the general health of infants has been documented for over 5,000 years. A variety of physical disturbances (anything from minor upsets to potentially fatal illnesses) have historically been attributed to teething, however a number of recent publications have alluded to a clarification of some of the disputed features of teething. It is now accepted that the localised symptoms of teething vary between individuals, however, 'teething' continues to be an inappropriate diagnosis proffered by both healthcare professionals and lay people. Severe systemic upsets are unrelated to teething and, if present, the infant should be promptly referred to a physician for an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. The treatment modalities used in teething have been diverse throughout the ages, frequently depending on the tenets of the medical profession and lay people, but now principally involve pain relief. This article examines the signs and symptoms frequently attributed to teething and their possible alternative causes. The contemporary principles of the management of teething are discussed, including supportive measures, the diverse range of available topical and systemic pharmacological preparations and the 'alternative' holistic therapies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G T McIntyre, G M McIntyre. 2002-03-09. Teething troubles?. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801349

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of oxidant stress and reactive nitrogen species in acetaminophen hepatotoxicity.

Acetaminophen (AAP) overdose can cause severe hepatotoxicity and even liver failure in experimental animals and humans. Despite substantial efforts over the last 30 years, the mechanism of AAP-induced liver cell injury is still not completely understood. It is widely accepted that the injury process is initiated by the metabolism of AAP to a reactive metabolite, which first depletes glutathione and then binds to cellular proteins including a number of mitochondrial proteins. One consequence of this process may be the observed inhibition of mitochondrial respiration, ATP depletion and mitochondrial oxidant stress. In the presence of sufficient vitamin E, reactive oxygen formation does not induce severe lipid peroxidation but the superoxide reacts with nitric oxide to form peroxynitrite, a powerful oxidant and nitrating agent. Peroxynitrite can modify cellular macromolecules and may aggravate mitochondrial dysfunction and ATP depletion leading to cellular oncotic necrosis in hepatocytes and sinusoidal endothelial cells. Thus, we hypothesize that reactive metabolite formation and protein binding initiate the injury process, which may be then propagated and amplified by mitochondrial dysfunction and peroxynitrite formation. This concept also reconciles many of the controversial findings of the past and provides a viable hypothesis for the mechanism of hepatocellular injury after AAP overdose.

Acetaminophen↗

Does acetaminophen interfere in the antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media caused by a penicillin-resistant pneumococcus strain? A gerbil model.

The possible interference of acetaminophen, combined with antibiotics, in the treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) caused by a penicillin-resistant (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC], 2 microg/mL), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid- and erythromycin-sensitive pneumococcus was evaluated in a gerbil model. Animals were challenged with approximately 5 x 106 bacteria in each ear through transbullar instillation. Acetaminophen was administered s.c. at 50 mg/kg 30 min before each antibiotic dose. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and erythromycin (2.5 and 10 mg/kg) were administered s.c. at 2, 10, and 18 h after inoculation. Samples were obtained from the middle ear (ME) on day 2 after inoculation for bacterial count. The overall results showed no difference between animals that received acetaminophen, with or without antibiotics, and those that did not receive acetaminophen. The antibiotic concentrations in the ME were practically identical in both groups of animals, so acetaminophen did not interfere with the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in the ME. However, both antibiotics significantly reduced the number of culture-positive and the bacterial concentration in ME samples when compared with antibiotic-untreated animals. Both antibiotics, whether combined with acetaminophen or not, lowered the number of AOM to <25%, but >75% of animals presented otitis media with effusion, and no differences were shown between groups. A high rate of bacterial eradication from the ME correlated with antibiotic serum concentrations being over the MIC of the infecting organism for only >15% of the dose interval and with an ME concentration exceeding the MIC by a factor of 1.7. In this experimental model, acetaminophen had neither a synergistic nor an antagonistic effect on the antibiotics tested.

Acetaminophen↗