PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12056279

[Sources of error and risks in CT based navigation].

Abstract

Based on the experience of 4 cervical, 102 thoracic/lumbar pedicle screw and 14 transiliosacral screw implantations all problems and complications were collected. Problems noted within the data collection in the preoperative CT were an incomplete acquisition of the surgical target (n = 3), an exceeding of the processable scan slices (n = 1) and a non focused field of view. Transmission of the CT datas often were documented as incomplete (n = 16). Segmentation of the CT dataset turned out to be the significant problem with incorrect differentiation of the bone-soft tissue transition (n = 2), where as the choice of the matching points and the trajectories did not provoke any mistakes in the planning modus. The intraoperative matching of both corresponding datasets was insufficient (n = 7), while the assignment of the CT dataset to the correct vertebral was not a major problem (n = 1). Navigation was not possible (n = 2) due to an instability of the spinal process. All fiducial based matching procedures (pelvis) were carried out without any problems. During intraoperative navigation potential complications resulted from deformation of instruments (n = 1) and interaction of instruments and the data reference base (n = 2). Further, the CT-based navigation of fractured vertebrae or unstable iliosacral joints is not safe, because dislocations between acquisition of the dataset and operation will lead to misguidance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Arand, L Kinzl, F Gebhard. 2002. [Sources of error and risks in CT based navigation].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-001-0279-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗

Impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants.

Cosmetic breast implants are increasing in popularity. The presence of a breast implant overlying the anterior mediastinal space as a cause of impairment of the echocardiographic acoustic window has not been described previously. Here, we report three cases with significant impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants. Clinicians should be aware of this interference and women should be informed of this dilemma before considering this cosmetic surgery.

Artifacts↗