PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12061907

Gastrointestinal perception: pathophysiological implications.

Abstract

Physiological gut stimuli during the digestive process are not normally perceived. However, gut stimuli activate a variety of afferent pathways and in some circumstances may induce conscious sensations. Experimental evidence gathered during the past decade suggests that patients with functional gut disorders and unexplained abdominal symptoms may have a sensory dysfunction of the gut, so that physiological stimuli would induce symptoms. Assessment of visceral sensitivity is still poorly developed, but in analogy to somatosensory testing, differential stimulation of visceral afferents may be achieved by a combination of stimulation techniques, which may help to characterize sensory dysfunctions. Visceral afferent input is modulated by a series of mechanisms at different levels of the brain gut axis, and conceivably, a dysfunction of these regulatory mechanisms could cause hyperalgesia. The sensory dysfunction in functional patients seems associated to altered reflex activity, and both mechanisms may interact to produce the symptoms. Evidence of a gut sensory-reflex dysfunction as a common pathophysiological mechanism in different functional gastrointestinal disorders, would suggest that they are different forms of the same process, and that the clinical manifestations depend on the specific pathways affected.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fernando Azpiroz. 2002. Gastrointestinal perception: pathophysiological implications.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2982.2002.00324.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Late morbidity profiles in prostate cancer patients treated to 79-84 Gy by a simple four-field coplanar beam arrangement.

PURPOSE: To describe the frequency and magnitude of late GI and GU morbidity in prostate cancer patients treated to high dose levels with a simple three-dimensional conformal technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 156 intermediate- and high-risk patients were treated between January 1, 1992 and February 28, 1999 with a simple four-field three-dimensional conformal technique to 79-84 Gy. All patients were treated with a four-field conformal technique; the prostate received 82 Gy and the seminal vesicles and periprostatic tissue 46 Gy. GI and GU toxicity was scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Late Morbidity Grading Scale and compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: The late Grade 2 GI complication rate was 9% and 38% at 3 years for patients treated with and without rectal blocking, respectively (p = 0.0004). No Grade 3 late GI complications developed. The rate of Grade 2 late GU complications was 5%, 8%, and 12% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. The Grade 3 late GU complication rate was 2% at 36 months. These differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The treatment method described is a simple four-field conformal technique that can be easily implemented in the general radiation community. A dose of 79-84 Gy can be safely delivered to the prostate, with a 9% rate of late Grade 2 GI, 12% rate of late Grade 2 GU, and 2% rate of late Grade 3 GU complications.

Digestive System↗