PubMed · 12068905
A necessary inhumanity?
Abstract
It is argued that the phrase "Necessary Inhumanity" more accurately describes the alienation required of doctors in some circumstances, than do modern sanitised coinages such as 'clinical detachment.' 'Detachment' and 'objectivity' imply separation, not engagement: creating distance not only from patients, but from the self: the process may well be required, but where it becomes too extreme or prolonged, it can damage everybody, including patients, family members, doctors themselves, and wider society. An awareness of the history of health care in the context of our society might assist self reflection--might help keep initiates in touch with the culture they have been induced to leave and might help them remain humane despite the bruising process of training.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R Richardson. 2000. A necessary inhumanity?. https://doi.org/10.1136/mh.26.2.104
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.