PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12083639

'Overwhelmingly positive'.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Howard Farran. 2002. 'Overwhelmingly positive'.. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0246

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment initial experience.

PURPOSE: To examine the performance and reproducibility of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system with a set of mammograms obtained in 100 patients who had undergone biopsy after positive findings at mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred positive mammographic examinations (four views each), depicting 96 masses and 50 microcalcification clusters, were scanned and analyzed three times by the CAD system. Reproducibility of detection sensitivity and the individual CAD-generated cues in the three images were examined. Both abnormality- and region-based detection sensitivities were compared. RESULTS: Forty-eight (96.0%) of 50 microcalcification clusters were marked on all three images in the abnormality-based analysis. Of the remaining two clusters, one was marked in two images and one was marked in only one. The abnormality-based sensitivity for mass detection ranged from 66.7% (64 of 96) to 70.8% (68 of 96). The system generated identical patterns (including images with and those without cues) for all three images in 53.3% (213 of 400) of images. For true-positive cluster regions, 88.9% (80 of 90) were marked at the same location in all images. For true-positive mass regions, 69.5% (82 of 118) were marked at the same locations in all images. In false-positive detections, only 44.0% (81 of 184) of false-positive mass regions and 31.9% (38 of 119) of false-positive cluster regions were marked at the same locations on all three images. CONCLUSION: Reproducibility of marked regions generated by the CAD system is improved from that reported previously, largely as a result of the substantial reduction in the false-positive detection rates. Reproducibility of true-positive identification of masses remains an important issue that may have methodologic and clinical practice implications.

Biopsy↗

Application of real-time polymerase chain reaction technology to detect prostatic bacteria in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

To investigate the potential association between prostate infection and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), we used molecular approaches described in previous reports. These methods employed standard polymerase chain (PCR) reaction assays to provide a qualitative evaluation of prostatic bacterial species. Here, we report on the detection of prostatic bacteria using a real-time PCR. Template DNAs were examined from prostatic tissue samples from patients with CP/CPPS. Two PCR primer sets were used: one that amplifies a portion of all known bacterial ribosomal DNAs (16S rDNAs) and one that is specific for Escherichia coli as opposed to related, E. coli-like bacteria. The 16S rDNA real-time PCR assay detected bacterial DNAs in eight (26%) of 31 samples from patients with CP/CPPS, including three samples (10%) that were also positive by the E. coli real-time PCR assay. These E. coli positives were quantified at approximately 10(3) cfu/ml of tissue digested. Quantification, speed and specificity make real-time PCR a promising approach for the quantitative detection and identification of prostatic bacteria from CP/CPPS patients.

Biopsy↗