PubMed · 12159218
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D A Fonseca Am, H W Halbe, R M Busana Clauzet. 1976. [Menstrual dysfunction].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12159218/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Functional hypothalamic amenorrhea is a common, non-organic and theoretically reversible form of anovulation due to reduced hypothalamic GnRH drive. Numerous studies suggest that this altered hypothalamic homeostasis is caused by a synergism between psychogenic challenge, promoted in part by dysfunctional attitudes, and metabolic compromise induced by undernutrition and overexercise. The recent growing interest in psychiatric comorbidity underlines the importance of reconsidering the boundaries between psychological disorders and somatic conditions. That not withstanding, it is mandatory in gynecological endocrinology to explore the issue of secondary amenorrhea from a psychoneuroendocrine perspective in order to devise biopsychosocial interventions which address the individual distress. In this brief review we will try to critically discuss the issue providing evidences from personal studies as clues for better understanding the extent of the complex psychoneuroendocrine network controlling menstrual function.
Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, in particular goserelin ('Zoladex'), are increasingly being used for the treatment of breast cancer in women with functioning ovaries. They act by downregulating pituitary GnRH receptors, thereby suppressing the release of luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), which, in turn, reduce the main source of oestradiol production in the ovaries. GnRH agonists have been shown to be as effective therapeutically as surgical ovarian ablation in pre- and perimenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. The combination of a GnRH agonist such as goserelin with the peripheral oestrogen antagonist, tamoxifen, may be used to produce 'combined oestrogen blockade'. In advanced breast cancer, this regimen prolongs progression-free survival and increases both the response rate and duration relative to the use of a GnRH agonist alone. In patients with early breast cancer, the addition of goserelin to 'standard treatment' (i.e. surgery+/-tamoxifen, chemotherapy or radiotherapy) results in a significant benefit in recurrence-free survival and overall survival. This benefit was most apparent in patients with oestrogen receptor (ER) +ve tumours. Goserelin, when used either alone or in combination with tamoxifen as an adjuvant systemic therapy in women with ER +ve tumours, has been shown in clinical trials to produce recurrence-free survival rates equivalent to cytotoxic chemotherapy such as cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Evidence suggests that at least part of the effect of adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy in premenopausal women is produced by ovarian ablation. Endocrine therapy with goserelin or goserelin plus tamoxifen should now be considered a treatment option in the management of premenopausal women with ER +ve early breast cancer.
The standard first-line treatment for normogonadotropic anovulatory infertile patients [referred to as World Health Organization group 2 (WHO 2)] is ovulation induction using clomiphene citrate (CC) in incremental doses. Twenty to 25% of women show clomiphene-resistant anovulation (CRA), that is, they remain anovulatory even after multiple attempts with increased doses of CC. About 50% of the ovulatory CC patients conceive within six CC-induced cycles. Given the heterogeneous nature of the group, the individual prognosis (i.e., the chance of success) will vary considerably between patients. In the event an individual prognosis of each patient would be available before the start of the treatment, the overall efficiency of ovulation induction could be improved. Prognostic evidence at an individual level should use multiple patient variables, including results from previous treatments (if any). When variables are interdependent, a statistical model can be used to relate individual characteristics with the predicted outcome. Such a model will provide estimates of prognosis for individualized patient profiles, allowing new patients to profit from the experience of the cohort of previous patients used to build the model. This paper discusses the prediction of time to pregnancy following induction of ovulation with CC. This prediction was broken down in two steps, leading to two separate prognostic models. The first model predicts an intermediate outcome, the chance that the patient will be CRA (i.e., no ovulation in response to CC medication); the second model predicts the final outcome (time until pregnancy) in women who do ovulate. The CRA model was based on a prospective cohort study of 201 patients with normogonadotropic oligoamenorrheic infertility, 45 of whom were CRA (22%). It contained four predictor variables all related to the diagnosis of PCOS within the group of WHO 2: Increased free androgen index (FAI; hyperandrogenemia), elevated body mass index (BMI; obesity), greater mean ovarian volume (as an ultrasound feature of polycystic ovaries), and amenorrhea were all predictive for CRA. The second model was based on the non-CRA patients and contained two prognostic variables: increased age and oligomenorrhea were predictive for longer time to pregnancy after first ovulation with CC. Using the example of the prediction of time to pregnancy following induction of ovulation with CC, we present and discuss characteristics of good prognostic evidence for clinical use, focusing on study design, statistical analysis, evaluation, and presentation of results.